Memorandum
To:
District 6 Parents and Community Education Council
Re: Proposal
to eliminate school attendance zones
From: Leonie
Haimson, Class Size Matters
Date: 10/16/12
CC: Council Member Robert Jackson, Sarah
Morgridge
After reading the materials presented by the CEC 6 zoning
committee and news clips about this issue, I believe there is an important
point that has been left out of the public discussion about the pros and cons of
eliminating school zones from your district.
If your
CEC does approve the proposal to eliminate school zones, this would allow the
DOE to close any elementary or middle school in the district and replace it
with a charter school.
The sole legal authority of the
CECs that the DOE currently respects is to approve or disapprove changes in
attendance zones. (See: Article 52-A - § 2590-E Powers and Duties of
Community District Education Council http://law.onecle.com/new-york/education/EDN02590-E_2590-E.html)
In February 2009, Joel Klein announced he would close three zoned elementary schools: PS 194 and PS 241 in Harlem and PS 150 in the Ocean Hill-Brownsville, and put charters in their place. (According to emails FOILed by Juan Gonzalez of the Daily News, Eva Moskowitz had asked Klein the year before for the buildings of two of these schools as locations for her Harlem Success charters: "Those schools are ps194 and ps241," she wrote to Klein. "It would be extremely helpful to move quickly on." http://bit.ly/R3pDw9 )
On March 24, 2009, the NYCLU/UFT sued DOE in the NYS Supreme Court, pointing out that the decision to close a zoned school must first be put to a vote of the CEC, as this would involve eliminating an attendance zone, which clearly entails changing of attendance lines. Plaintiffs included parents at the closing schools and CEC members from Districts 3 and 23:
“Plaintiffs asked in
the lawsuit that the court rule that the DOE’s policy in these cases is a
violation of state education law, order the DOE to stop it and reserve such
zone alterations to Community Education Councils.”
An article about this lawsuit is here: http://shar.es/c1dNF and the legal complaint posted here: http://www.nyclu.org/files/CEC_Suit_03.24.09.PDF
Less than two weeks later, the DOE had dropped its plans to
close these schools: http://bit.ly/R3odlj
Presumably, DOE officials realized that the CECs in District
3 and 27 would never approve their plan to eliminate the zones for these
schools, knowing full well that they intended to replace them with charters.
Here is the announcement from the NYCLU:
April 2, 2009 — The New York City Department of
Education has apparently decided to keep three schools open after public school
parents, guardians and community leaders filed a lawsuit last week. That
lawsuit charged the DOE with violating state education law by making zoning
changes that affect neighborhood schools without approval from Community
Education Councils, effectively denying parents and children access to
neighborhood schools without a voice in the process.
The DOE
did not respond to the lawsuit in court, but today told the media that the
three schools would remain open.
“It
shouldn’t take a lawsuit to make the DOE follow the law,” said New York Civil
Liberties Union Executive Director Donna Lieberman. “Zoning laws are the one
small area of oversight that parents were allowed to keep under mayoral
control. The state legislature should take note of the fact that we had to take
the DOE to court to get the public’s voice heard as prescribed by law.”
The vast majority of schools that DOE has closed up to now
are unzoned Middle and High Schools.
In a few cases, they have closed a zoned public school, but have been
forced to open up another zoned public school in the same building.
In conclusion, you should be very
cautious before eliminating your school attendance zones, unless you support allowing
DOE to unilaterally close any of your neighborhood schools and
replace them with charter schools.
It's sad that the worst districts in NYC are 7 & 9.
ReplyDelete