Showing posts with label diversity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label diversity. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 4, 2020

Shino Tanikawa on how Fair Student Funding system works against class size reduction and how small classes would facilitate integration

Testimony from Feb. 28 class size hearings at City Hall from Shino Tanikawa, a NYC public school parent leader. Shino is a member of the Fair Student Funding (FSF) taskforce, and  discusses the difficult decisions principals must make regarding class size when the FSF system devised by DOE incentivizes them to overcrowd their schools and keep class sizes large.

Also a member of the School Diversity Advisory Group, Shino explains how how smaller classes would make it easier for teachers to reach all their students and develop close relationships with them, no matter their background and academic level. Shino co-authored an oped in the Daily News on this subject last spring.

 Below the video is her written testimony.



Testimony of Shino Tanikawa at Class Size Hearings on Feb. 28 from Class Size Matters on Vimeo.

Wednesday, September 13, 2017

The response of District 1 CEC to the Mayor's "Diversity Plan" announced yesterday

Yesterday Deputy Chancellor Josh Wallack of NYC DOE announced their diversity plan for District 1 on the lower East Side.  The elected parent representatives on the District 1 Community Education Council were not pleased with the plan, and felt that it ignored their input and their more ambitious "controlled choice" proposal to integrate their schools -- which they had been working on for several years. 

Again, the crucial factor of trust that DOE supposedly prides itself on and that the NYC Kids PAC report card discussed was broken.

Here is Naomi Pena of the CEC, as quoted by WNYC: "It’s not going to move the needle. Wealthier families are going to be very hesitant to apply to schools that are low-income. The same goes the other way.... For them to come back with this is a major slap in the face. The DOE knows nothing else but segregation. That’s what their legacy is. So when they take a plan that has a potential for change, and butcher it, it offends me....The community, myself, were used as pawns.  DOE turned it into an admission policy that the community did not want."

Below is the message sent out by the CEC today:

The Mayor's Election Day "Diversity Plan" for District 1:

School is back in session. Election Day arrived. And yesterday, Mayor De Blasio’s Department of Education announced a new enrollment proposal for pre-k and kindergarten admissions in Community School District 1.
The results are now in: the Mayor’s “plan” has not earned this Council’s vote.
Over many years, the parent leaders of District 1 have done our homework:
  • We sounded the alarm about school segregation before it became fashionable for political candidates to have a “diversity plan.”
  • We searched for communities that have tackled segregation, and we found the leading expert in the field.  
  • We secured a federally-funded, NY state grant to introduce an evidence-based, enrollment model called “controlled choice.”
  • And with the help of our D1 Mom Squad, we spread the word and earned the community’s support.
By contrast, today the Department of Education:
  • Proposes a new policy not backed by available research,
  • Plans to spend federally-funded state money on this new policy, knowing that it cannot achieve our shared integration goals, and
  • Measures success according to the loose criteria from the Mayor’s “diversity plan,” widely described by NYC education reporters as… “not a plan.”
Today and in the past, we have called out District and DOE leadership for their secrecy and delay tactics that have harmed the prospects for integration and equity in our schools.
At the same time, we also acknowledge that DOE has heard some of our concerns. The DOE's new proposal contains fairness principles that any good plan should have. The proposal:
  • Applies to the entire school district and not just a few schools,
  • Applies to both pre-K and kindergarten enrollment policies, and
  • Proposes that each school’s population should reflect the local community with regards to a student's family income, language, and housing status.
But despite these improvements, the DOE’s plan is not one that our students deserve. And it is not one that our families have asked for.
Our fight for equity and against segregation is a campaign, not a grant program. We, the parent leaders of the Community Education Council will continue to advocate for our community, regardless of how this DOE policy plays out. And we will continue to hold the District accountable for their actions.
About the DOE Proposal, and our many questions:
The DOE today released its Diversity in Admissions proposal for priority choice enrollment at our schools and for a new family resource center. The proposal may sound like the controlled choice plan developed by leading experts and endorsed by the District 1 Community Education Council. But it is not that plan, and it does not benefit from decades of research and data.
Under the DOE proposal, students who qualify for free or reduced lunch, English language learners, and students in temporary housing will receive priority admission to their school of choice. The aspiration is for every school’s population to reflect the community at large, where 2 out of 3 students in District 1 have been identified to meet one or more of these priority criteria.
Should the DOE proposal continue? We have lots of questions, and we welcome yours as well.
  • Will the new Family Resource Center include on-site enrollment with transparency for families to see the chances of getting into their top-choice schools, and for schools to monitor outreach and integration progress?
  • How will the DOE give priority to students with disabilities when considering equity in our schools?
  • Will this plan change the fact that students in temporary housing are concentrated in just a few schools?
  • Given that the DOE proposal relies solely on free/reduced lunch status as the primary priority indicator, how will the Department maintain data quality under the Mayor’s new policy, which we support, for universal free lunch?
  • To assure fairness, how will the DOE protect against gaming the system when families fill out their applications?
  • We have been advocating that the goal should be that all schools reflect the demographics of the community, within +/- 5% of key indicators. Why does DOE feel that a wider range of +/- 10% for a basket of indicators is good enough to achieve equity? Why is lowering the bar of success better than honestly addressing shortfalls?
  • Will there be a new enrollment form for pre-k and kindergarten that makes it possible for DOE to identify priority students? Given that student needs are not identified until kindergarten, will DOE rely on self-reporting language, income, housing, or disability status? Or will this all be guesswork?
  • Will DOE measure success based on the November 1 enrollment data after students actually enroll? Or will it be based on the less accurate application data from September, like the current set-asides?
  • How specifically will DOE provide transparency on district-wide and school-level data for the public to monitor progress?
But perhaps our biggest question is: why did the DOE and the Mayor ignore the grassroots effort to research and propose an evidence-based plan, in favor of something brand new and untested?
Stay tuned for more updates. And please forward this email to other parents and friends. Ask them to sign up for the Community Education Council District 1 list serve: https://cecd1.org/signup/

Sunday, April 19, 2015

NYC KidsPAC Parents and Advocates release Education report card for Mayor de Blasio



Media outlets that reported on our report card include News 12-TV, Wall St. Journal, NY Post, WCBS radio, and Epoch Times (in Chinese).  Please take a look at the grades we awarded the mayor on education issues below, and leave a comment on the blog.  thanks, Leonie 

For immediate release: April 19, 2015


Contact: Shino Tanikawa, 917-770-8438, estuaryqueen@gmail.com

Leonie Haimson, 917-435-9329, leonie@classsizematters.org


NYC KidsPAC releases Education report card for Mayor de Blasio

Grades range from As to Fs in many crucial areas


Today, Sunday April 19 at noon, in front of the Department of Education headquarters at Tweed, NYC KidsPAC released a report card for Mayor de Blasio, based on how many of his campaign promises he has fulfilled in the area of education policy after more than a year in office. NYC KidsPAC is a political action committee made up of parent leaders and advocates who work for better schools by issuing candidate surveys, informing the electorate about the results, and supporting candidates who have demonstrated a commitment to improving our city’s public schools.


NYC KidsPAC provided the DOE and the Mayor’s office with this report three weeks ago, and received no response. They will now provide the report to the leaders and members of the State Legislature, to help them decide whether to renew mayoral control.

In 2013 NYCKids PAC endorsed Bill de Blasio for Mayor, citing the hope he would “stop the rampant privatization of our schools and the overemphasis on testing, will listen more closely to the concerns of parents and communities, and will push for new investments in expanding preK, improving classroom conditions and alleviating school overcrowding.” We believe that De Blasio has a better understanding of the issues than the previous administration, and has made several positive changes, most notably the expansion of preKindergarten, but has yet to live up to his promises in other important areas.

bdb report card betterThe grades the Mayor received from NYC KidsPAC are decidedly mixed, ranging from “A” and “A-“ on cell phones, school closings, and arts education, to a “B” on testing, and a “D” on co-locations, space planning, parent engagement and input, special education and student privacy. He received an “F” on class size, transparency and accountability and diversity.

Shino Tanikawa, president of NYC KidsPAC and a Manhattan parent leader explained: “We thank Mayor de Blasio on his reversal of the cell phone ban and halting school closures, two issues that are important to many parents. We are also encouraged by his commitment to arts education. The Mayor expressed some very promising ideas for improving the governance of our school system during his campaign. For example, he proposed fixed terms for the Panel for Educational Policy members, and to ask Community Education Councils to vote on changes in school utilization including co-locations. Then PEP members would be required to refer to those votes in their decision-making. None of these reforms have yet occurred, and we have seen many damaging co-locations approved without reference to the priorities of parents in those communities. Our report gives him a “D” in the category of Co-locations, and an incomplete in Governance. Though we hope that he will deliver on more of his promises soon, we must oppose the renewal of mayoral control without real checks and balances and more decision-making power given to parents and community members.”

Eduardo Hernandez, a member of Community Education Council in District 8 in the Bronx, said: “NYC kids have just endured three strenuous days of ELA testing and will sit through another three days in math next week. We gave the Mayor a “B” in this category, because the DOE has acknowledged that parents have the right to opt out their children out of testing, and engage in another activity. However, the DOE has not publicized this sufficiently, and many parents remain unaware of their rights. The Mayor has neglected to reform the admissions process to gifted programs and to the five selective, specialized high schools under his control that still rely solely on test scores. Though when he ran for office, he pledged to make admissions to these programs and schools based on more holistic factors, they are still based solely on high-stakes exams with racially disparate outcomes.”

“Overcrowded classrooms and rising enrollments are pervasive problems that have plagued our children’s schools for far too long. We gave him an “Incomplete” because so far the de Blasio Administration has failed to act follow up on his promises to alleviate overcrowding by improving the school capital plan, which is months overdue. The current version of the plan doesn’t meet one third of the actual need, given existing overcrowding and enrollment projections, and without improvement, NYC kids are likely result to be subjected to even more crammed conditions in the future,” said Andy Lachman, head of Parent Leaders of Upper East Side Schools (PLUS).

As Gloria Corsino, president of the Citywide Council for District 75, pointed out, “Bill de Blasio gets an “F” when it comes to transparency and accountability. Our education budget is no clearer than under Bloomberg; huge consulting contracts are still approved by the PEP with little or no explanation, including a $1 billion contract that was awarded to a company that had engaged in a kickback scheme. Luckily, City Hall reversed that decision at the last minute, but this is a contract that should never have been proposed in the first place. Freedom of Information requests are responded to no more quickly, and the DOE still refuses to count all the kids in trailers, including hundreds of students with disabilities, and thousands of high school students. The recommendations of the Blue Book working group for improving the accuracy of DOE’s figures on overcrowding have still not been released to the public.”

Karen Sprowal, a parent leader in Upper Manhattan, gave some of the reasons why the Mayor received a “D” for Parent engagement: “It is very disappointing that parents have so little input under this administration. The Chancellor now claims in court that School Leadership Teams, composed of half parents, have only advisory powers, which is contrary to state law. The DOE revamped their parent survey without any input from parents, and took out what we considered the most important question, as to which improvement strategy we would most like to see in our schools, a question that has been asked by DOE since 2007. Too often at Town Hall meetings, the Chancellor responds to parental concerns with a dismissive attitude. Sadly, we have also heard from many CEC members that they still feel their views are not consulted before important decisions are made.”

Leonie Haimson, Executive Director of Class Size Matters, said, “The Mayor gets an “F” on class size, because he has fulfilled none of his promises on this critical issue, the top priority of parents according to the DOE’s own surveys. Despite his commitment to reduce class size significantly, and if necessary, raise funds to do so, class sizes remain at a fifteen year high in the early grades, and the administration has taken no action in this area or indicated that they intend to follow through in any way. In fact, the Chancellor has repeatedly ignored the concerns expressed by educators and parents, and has stated that class size is not a problem that needs to be solved, despite the decision of the state’s highest court that NYC children are denied their constitutional rights because their classes are too large. “

“NYC KidsPAC gives the Mayor an “F” for diversity, as the well-documented segregation in NYC schools has not been addressed despite his campaign promises. The administration has failed to respond to communities asking for district-wide solutions that have been shown to increase equity of access in numerous school systems across the country. Mayor de Blasio has failed to live up to his obligation to address this civil rights issue by amending the admissions policies that stratify our schools,” concluded Lisa Donlan, President of Community Education Council in District One on the Lower East Side.

The Mayor’s report card, along with an analysis of the Mayor’s performance on this and other issues, can be downloaded here and viewed below.  It is also posted at www.NYCKidsPAC.org

###