Monday, November 25, 2013

Parents Demand More Accountability in the Appointment of Members of the Board of Regents



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - November 25, 2013

More information contact: 
 
Eric Mihelbergel (716) 553-1123;
nys.allies@gmail.com
Lisa Rudley (917) 414-9190;
nys.allies@gmail.com
NYS Allies for Public Education -
www.nysape.org

Parents Demand More Accountability in the Appointment of Members of the Board of Regents

Parents across New York State are demanding that members of the Board of Regents up for re-appointment this March, Regents Christine Cea, James Jackson, James Cotrell, and Wade Norwood, publicly clarify their positions on the current education reforms.
“Those members of the Board of Regents who do not support an agenda that includes an immediate moratorium on high stakes Common Core testing and the sharing of student data must be replaced with new members who will recognize their responsibility to protect our children and our schools,” said Eric Mihelbergel, a public school parent in Buffalo and a founding member of the NYS Allies for Public Education. Mihelbergel went on to say, “the people of New York have lost confidence in Commissioner John King, Chancellor Merryl Tisch and the current Board of Regents to call a halt to these destructive education policies.”
Lisa Rudley, a public school parent in Ossining and a founding member of NYS Allies for Public Education, said “As evidenced in the Albany Times Union, Sunday, Nov. 24, 2013, the Regents’ policy on allowing privately funded fellows with little to no public education experience to drive curriculum calls into question the integrity of the system.  We need an educational plan in New York not a marketing plan.”
The process of electing Board of Regents members has long been an elusive process that has not been widely understood by the public.  Persons wishing to apply for a position submit a resume to Assemblywomen Catherine Nolan, Chair of the Education Committee, and Deborah Glick, Chair of the Higher Education Committee, by January 31, 2014.  In-person interviews are then conducted in Albany in February by Nolan and Glick.  
Although all legislators vote in early March, the process is controlled by the Democratic Majority of the Assembly.  Many Republican members abstain from the voting process altogether, because it is so strongly controlled by the Democratic Majority and Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver. Legislators are typically given less than 24-hour’s notice of the vote, and up to now, a current Regent is almost automatically re-appointed until they resign or retire. 
"As a parent of four school-aged children, I am shocked at how the majority of Regents members have not listened to the protests of their constituents -- parents, educators and members of the communities whose interests they are supposed to serve, and have been silent while the Commissioner imposes one damaging policy after another. It is time for REAL change at the Board of Regents and at the NYS Education Department" said Tim Farley, a parent and a principal of the Ichabod Crane School in Kinderhook, New York.
NYS Allies for Public Education is proposing parents adopt an Action Plan to lobby their legislators to appoint four Board of Regents members who will support a call for a moratorium on high-stakes testing, data sharing, and the Common Core modules and curriculum.  In alignment with this goal, the organization will be sending out a survey to the current Regents members whose terms are up, as well as other applicants for these positions, to seek and publicize their views on these critical issues.
Jeanette Deutermann, public school parent in Bellmore and Long Island Opt-Out Facebook founder, says, “Parents will no longer allow Board of Regents members to be re-elected when they are not doing their job for children.  We will hold legislators accountable for their votes for or against individual Regents.  New Regents must be elected that support a moratorium on current practices.”
Leonie Haimson, Executive Director of Class Size Matters and a founding member of NYS Allies for Public Education said, “Many educators have pointed out the high costs and low quality of the Common Core modules adopted by the NYS Education Department.  These critics include Carol Burris, an award-winning NY Principal who in the Washington Post, pointed out that NYSED paid more than $14 million for faulty math modules produced by a company called Common Core Inc.  At the same time, this same company has received millions from the Gates Foundation, which also spent $100 million to fund inBloom Inc., a corporation that is collecting highly sensitive and personal student information without parental consent, and putting it on a data cloud, so that it can more easily be shared with for-profit vendors.” 
Though seven of the nine original inBloom states have pulled out, Commissioner King says he is determined to go ahead with this data-mining project, and is sharing the personal information for the entire state’s public school students with inBloom, despite the protests of parents, school board members, and Superintendents, as well as a lawsuit filed in court two weeks ago.  The Gates Foundation is also helping to pay for the salaries of the Regents fellows who have been placed in charge of implementing the Common Core and this data-sharing project.
“This evident conflict of interest calls into serious question who is controlling education policies in this state, and whether private funders have been allowed undue influence over our children,” says Bianca Tanis, a public school parent in New Paltz and steering member of Re-Thinking Testing Mid-Hudson Region.
New York State Allies for Public Education represents forty-five grassroots parent groups from every corner of the Empire State. The organizations are proud to stand with the parents, community members and fellow educators in NYSAPE to call for a change in direction and policy beginning with new leadership at the New York State Education Department.
###

Saturday, November 23, 2013

Video and account of hearings on the dangers of inBloom and private data-sharing in Albany

Video  of Wednesday’s excellent NY Assembly hearings in Albany on inBloom and student privacy are online and below, including riveting critiques from many of the Assemblymembers from both parties, who grilled Commissioner King and Associate Commissioner Ken Wagner of the NYS Education Department.  In turn, King and Wagner continued to obfuscate and tried as much as possible to avoid answering their direct questions or responding to their concerns.  
Chair of the NYS Assembly Education Committee Cathy Nolan was also particularly upset because inBloom refused to show up for the hearings after being asked to testify.  InBloom claimed a "prior engagement" --  the exact same response the NYC Council received from the company when the Education Committee held their hearings last month.
I was disturbed to learn that the state had already uploaded a large amount of personal student data to the inBloom cloud, only without names attached, apparently to help inBloom "test" and develop their infrastructure  -- though both Wagner and King avoided answering questions about what exact data elements were shared.
There was much compelling testimony offered by NYC parents Karen Sprowal, Valerie Williams, Vice President of CEC District 75, and Ossining parent Lisa Rudley of NYSAPE, all parents of special needs children who face the most risk from public disclosures of their disabilities.   Mary Fox Alter, Superintendent of Pleasantville schools, Karen Zevin, Croton Harmon School board member, and Tim Farley, principal of Ichabod Crane Middle School in Kinderhook NY were also eloquent in their opposition to the violation of student privacy rights this project represents.   Cathy Nolan was so impressed with Mary Fox Alter that she suggested she apply to be NYC Chancellor.
My testimony as well as that of Karen Sprowal and Valerie Williams starts at about 2 hrs 11 minute in; my written testimony is here.
Attorney Jane Lauer Barker who is representing NYC parents on a lawsuit to enjoin the state from sharing this data testified, at about 3 hours in, and was illuminating about how the state's disclosure of this information appears to violate the Personal Privacy Protection law, because it is not either necessary nor authorized by law.  She  also pointed out how the "service agreement" between NYSED and inBloom is totally one-sided: "it's not a service agreement that would ever have been drafted by an attorney for this particular client [NYSED] because it puts the onus and the burden on the State Education Department to protect the data, not on inBloom."
She cited several provisions that gives all the liability to NYSED and none to inBloom, including that inBloom makes no guarantee of compliance with any data privacy or security laws, will not warrant that its system is not susceptible to intrusions or hacking, and has no responsibility to notify anyone but NYSED if there are breaches. The agreement also contains no provisions for penalties to inBloom if a breach does occur. Her written testimony is here.
Also rather disturbing was the testimony (at about 4 hrs in) from David Little, director of Governmental Relations for the NY State School Boards Association. Despite the fervent protests of many school boards across the state against NYSED's data-sharing plans, Little minimized the risk of breaches and expressed opposition to any of the current bills introduced in the Legislature to require parental consent or opt out before personal data is shared with any third party vendor.  He said that disclosing this data could provide numerous benefits, including making it possible for colleges to gain access to students' behavioral/disciplinary records when considering their applications.  He remarked that such data could be calculated in the form of a numerical “inBloom score” that would be useful to colleges to consider alongside a student’s test scores and grades. On his way out of the hearing room,  I thanked Little for giving parents yet another example of why this plan is so repugnant to them. UPDATE: NYSSBA has put out a statement that Little was providing a "cautionary example".  A transcript of Little's full testimony is here.

 Just some of the MANY newsclips in recent days about the hearings and New York's data sharing plans:NY Only State Still on Board With School Data Plan (AP/ABC), Assembly grills education chief on data plan (Rochester Democrat & Chronicle); Common Core: Assembly grills education chief King on student-data privacy (LoHud Journal News); Data Dashboard fears addressed at education hearing (Times Herald-Record); Plan: Gather data on pupils (Albany Times Union); Student privacy a major concern (NY Public Radio); Assembly education chair threatens subpoena against data company (Capital New York).

Friday, November 15, 2013

Mayor-elect Bill de Blasio's Education Promises


On June 14, 2013, at a candidate forum held at Murray Bergtraum High School, Bill de Blasio pledged to follow through on the following education policies if elected mayor, and signed a document containing these promises. (These are marked as Forum below.) In response to a survey sent to all the mayoral candidates by NYC Kids PAC, de Blasio made other promises. (These are marked as Survey below.)

We have also included below certain key pledges from press releases from his campaign and a quote from one of the first mayoral debates.If you know of other important education promises de Blasio made during his campaign, please add them below, along with citations.  Thanks!
 
Governance
·         Institute a public screening process in choosing the Chancellor (GothamSchools on Nov. 20, 2012 Debate)
·         Only select a chancellor who does not require a waiver. (Survey)
·         Restore the district structure, with a superintendent who supervises principals and provides access for parents with issues and problems. (Survey)
·         Support a change in the law so that members of the Board of Education (currently called the Panel for Educational Policy) have set terms and cannot be fired at will by the mayor. (Survey)
·         Ensure that all Board of Education members are given at least two weeks to discuss the policy ideas at hand before bringing them to a vote. (Survey)
·         Raise the level of significance of the Community Education Councils. (Survey)
·         Allow CEC’s to vote on major school utilization changes in their communities and require the Board of Education address the CEC position on major school utilization changes during their meetings and work with the local CEC for alternative solutions. (Survey)
·         Work with the CEC’s to develop district plans and portfolio assessments within their respective communities to get an understanding what schools need to grow, what schools have space and what schools are struggling. (Survey)
·         Improve the role of the Citywide Education Councils (High School, Special Education, English Language Learners, D 75) by ensuring they provide written recommendations to the Board of Education on policy issues related to their respective councils. (Survey)
  
Special Education and Busing
·         DOE will seek recommendations from an independent commission on school busing, with representation from disability advocates, unions and parent groups, on standards for screening bidders, creating routes, safety, training, and fair labor practices. (Forum)
·         Provide independent monitoring to determine whether students with disabilities are receiving all their mandated services. (Forum)
·         Agree to commission a report, in consultation with Citywide Council on Special Education and the District 75 Citywide Council, by an independent research group on the implementation of the special education inclusion reform, including survey results from parents, students, administrators and educators at the school level. (Survey)
·         Continue to increase the learning opportunities for all students, especially students with disabilities who are most vulnerable. (Survey)
·         Survey parents of children with disabilities to get an understanding of the related services that are not being met. (Survey)

Support staff
·         Provide dedicated funding for positions of school support staff and parent coordinators, and redefine the position of parent coordinator so that parents have substantive input into their job description, hiring, and evaluation. (Forum)

Parent Engagement
·         Support a change in the State Education law so that all district public school parents have the right to vote for Community Education Council members. (Forum)
·         Ensure that all PTA and CEC meetings are streamed online for parents who are unable to attend. (Survey)
·         Create customer service guidelines for all schools by identifying model parent engagement schools and mirror these practices across the school system. In addition, provide training and guidance to ensure every school and DOE office welcomes and respects families. (Survey)
·         Rescind the ban on prohibiting students from bringing their cell phones to school. (Survey)

Preschool and Early Education

·         Prioritize expanding and improving early education by providing universal pre-K. (Survey)
·         Ensure that children, especially young children of color, are being given the resources they need to succeed prior to being referred to special education. This includes an emphasis on pre-kindergarten and early intervention. (Survey)
·         Create Early Education Centers within communities that will free up classroom space currently used for pre-kindergarten in community schools. (Survey)
After-School
·         Provide after-school programs for all middle school students. (Survey)
Class Size
·         Fight for the $3 billion in court-ordered state funding owed to NYC to reduce class sizes as a result of the Campaign for Fiscal Equity. (Survey)
·         Commit to specific class size reduction goals to achieve by the end of first mayoral term and if necessary, raise revenue to fund this. (Forum and Survey)
·         Comply with the plan the city adopted in 2007, as a response to the Contracts for Excellence law, calling for class size reduction in all grades. (Survey)
·         Audit the Contracts for Excellence budget to see how the city can re-prioritize reducing class size. (Survey)
·         Work with school supervisors and principals to adjust the school day schedule and maximize staff time with students. (Survey)
·         Re-evaluate “fair student funding” to discern whether it has provided more equity or, instead, incentives to principals to increase class size and/or get rid of their experienced teachers. (Survey)
·         Create Early Education Centers within communities that will free up classroom space currently used for pre-kindergarten in community schools. (Survey)

School overcrowding
·         Support a more ambitious capital plan that will provide the space necessary to eliminate overcrowding and allow for smaller classes as well as devote sufficient funds for maintenance and repair. (Forum and Survey)
·         Reform the blue book formula so it more accurately reflects overcrowding and incorporates the need for smaller classes. (Survey)
·         Commit to providing transparent enrollment projections. (Survey)
Spending priorities and privatization
·         Reduce the spending on privatization, outsourcing, contracts and consultants. (Survey)
·         Thoroughly evaluate all DOE contracts, maintaining contracts that are producing positive results for our schools. (Survey)
·         Focus on retaining talent “in-house” therefore eliminating unnecessary contracts. (Survey)
·         Develop protocols that will prevent the awarding of contracts to companies that have already shown to have stolen funds. (Survey)
Co-locations
·         Have a Moratorium on co-locations. (Press Release 9/3/2013)
·         Enforce provisions in state law, requiring co-located charter schools pay for the services and space that they receive from the DOE. (Forum and Survey)
·         Require more information on how co-locations will impact programs for students with disabilities in the building, establishing additional venues for parents to relay their concerns, and a process in which the DOE responds to parent's concerns. (Survey)

Small schools, vocational schools and online learning

·         Relax the requirement that all new schools be of a small size. (Survey)
·         Ensure that students have full, face-to-face, in-person access to teacher, or continue to expand online learning as the alternative. (Survey)
·         Improve Career and Technical Education programs. (Survey)
·         Focus on ensuring there are quality schools in EVERY neighborhood. (Survey)

Help schools improve rather than close them

·         Have a moratorium on school closures. (Press Release 9/3/2013)
·         Support rather than close struggling schools. (Survey)
·         Create an early warning system for schools that are falling further behind. (Survey)
·         Schools identified as struggling will receive targeted support through a new “Office of Strategic Supports” housed in the DOE that will develop intervention strategies in conjunction with the school communities and target individual high-need schools which will receive short-term, intensive support. (Survey)

Transparency and Accountability
·         Carry out itemized, fully detailed breakdowns of education budget comparable to other city agencies. (Survey)
·         Respond to FOILs in a timely and complete fashion. (Survey)
·         Provide an online log which reports on which FOILs have been submitted and when they were responded to, with a link to the results [along the model of the Illinois board of education; see http://www.isbe.state.il.us/foia/default.htm] (Survey)
·         Require more accurate reporting of class size and overcrowding. (Survey)
·         Commission independent and objective studies of major education initiatives. (Survey)


Privacy
·         Stop the sharing of highly sensitive information to vendors by the City without full parental knowledge and consent (Forum and Survey)
·         Pull NYC student data out of the inBloom cloud as soon as possible. (Survey)

Testing
·         Minimize the use of high-stakes standardized tests and agree to not use tests to decide which schools to close and which students to be held back. (Forum)
·         Craft a teacher evaluation system that depends as little as possible on standardized test scores. (Survey)
·         Refuse to expand standardized testing into other grades (Pre-K to 2nd). (Survey)
·         Pledge not to create new local standardized exams. (Survey)
·         Make admissions to all schools based on more holistic factors, and especially Gifted and Talented programs and the specialized high schools. (Survey)
·         Encourage other NYC high schools to join the portfolio/alternative assessment consortium as opposed to basing graduation decisions on the results of the Regents exams. (Survey)
·         Develop a non-punitive process by which NYC parents can choose to have their children opt-out of standardized testing. (Survey)
 
Community schools
·         Expand the community school model, which helps address mental health needs in our City’s school system. (Survey)

After School 
·         Dedicate funding for meaningful community-based after school programs. (Forum)

Discipline

·         Build capacity in schools for positive discipline strategies, and expand student support services through multi-agency/service provider collaboration. (Survey)
·         Adopt a Graduated Response Protocol to resolve student misbehavior at school level. (Survey)
·         Focus the role of School Safety Agents (SSA) on behavior that requires law enforcement response, by integrating SSA's with school administration team and conduct conferencing between SSAs and principals prior to arrests. (Survey)

Diversity
·         Ensure that curriculum, teaching, and hiring practices in all New York City public schools reflect the culture, history and language of the diversity of the City’s students. (Forum)
·         Commit to issuing a substantive policy paper by August 1st, explaining how to address the external conditions/outside school factors that cause the achievement gap based on race, class and zip code. (Forum)
·         Make sure that all children, regardless of socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity have access to our City's selective and specialized high schools. (Survey)

Arts Education
·         Launch a NYC Arts Instruction Campaign to raise private, philanthropic funding to support expansion of arts education (Survey)

Quality Teaching
·         Work to create career paths that encourage quality teachers to remain in teaching. (Survey)