Though the Commissioner, the Chancellor, the Mayor and most members of the media claimed otherwise, the multiple changes in the test this year and the fact that they were administered untimed made it impossible to compare results from this year to the last to discern if the scores indicate improved achievement or not.  What we do know is that the numbers of students opting out did grow- with the test non-participation rate rising from 20% to 22%.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: August 1, 2016
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: August 1, 2016
More information   contact:
Lisa Rudley (917)   414-9190; nys.allies@gmail.com 
Jeanette Deutermann (516)   902-9228; nys.allies@gmail.com  
NYS Allies for Public   Education (NYSAPE) www.nysape.org
NYSED Declares Scores Not Comparable, Opt Out Grows Across State
This past Friday   afternoon, the New York State Education Department (NYSED) released the   results of the 2016 NYS Common Core 3-8 ELA and math results. Despite   expensive ad campaigns from Gates-funded advocacy groups and the distribution   of "Anti Opt-out" toolkits by Commissioner Elia aimed at persuading   parents to opt in to state tests, the test non-participation rate increased   from 20 percent last year to 22 percent. 
As Chris Cerrone, a   school board member and NYSAPE member from Western NY said, "Given   Commissioner Elia’s public relation blitz across the state and all the   interviews she did with the media, as well as all the money spent by the   pro-Common Core groups, the increase in opt out numbers indicates that   parents remain very concerned about the low quality of these tests and the   direction of education in our state." 
An increase in test   refusals were seen across the state, including in large urban districts like   Buffalo and New York City. In only 5 percent of districts statewide --38 out   of 686 -- was the test participation rate at or above 95 percent for ELA and   math.  If the current proposed Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) regulations   are adopted, this would mean that the state would have to punish the vast   majority of schools by giving them low grades or imposing aggressive   intervention plans. (see chart below)
“Despite the   relentless and well-funded PR push back we received in the city, more and   more parents are becoming educated on just how harmful standardized testing   is for their children. The increase in opt-out is a significant win for   immigrant families, students with special needs and students from low income   households. Our grassroots approach is resonating with parents seeking true   equity in public education,” said Johanna Garcia, NYC parent and Co-President   of District 6 President’s Council.
"Overall, these   exams not only demonize our students and teachers, but the entire city of   Rochester. I will not allow my child to take an exam that does not accurately   reflect her progress. I'm not against testing, but I am against tests with no   educational value," Eileen Graham, Rochester parent of 4th grader and   founder of Black Student Leadership.
Long Island districts   again this year opted out in large numbers, some as high as 84%.  Many   other districts also experienced over 50% of student refusing to take the   tests. (see chart below)
Jeanette Deutermann,   Long Island public school parent, the founder of Long Island Opt Out and a   member of NYSAPE said, "The opt out movement continues to expand despite   the aggressive campaign to thwart our efforts and marginalize our voices.   Parents demand nothing short of a complete overhaul to our excessive testing   system, a ban on the mining of sensitive personal data, replacement of flawed   Common Core with research-based standards, and a permanent decoupling of   evaluations from test scores." 
Despite their own   warning that this year's test scores could not be compared to last year’s   because the tests were shorter and untimed, NYSED still claimed that   increases in this year’s ELA scores over last year’s scores justified their   continuing to implement the Common Core standards and Common Core aligned   exams. These contradictory statements undermine NYSED’s credibility. 
The reality is that   without a more careful analysis of the tests themselves, their length, and   the impact of giving them untimed, it is impossible to ascertain if   achievement increased, decreased, or stayed the same as last year.  In   addition, the fact that so few schools and districts had a 95% participation   rate also undermines their reliability.  
“The fact that 95% of   school districts in NYS did not meet the federal and state participation   requirements significantly weakens the reliability and validity of test   scores for accountability purposes. How can Commissioner Elia claim that   these scores are valid or show any improvement in achievement,” asked,   Jessica McNair, Central NY public school parent, educator, and Opt Out CNY   founder.
“There is little doubt   that parents will continue to exercise their right to refuse harmful state   tests and right now it is imperative that Commissioner Elia and the Board of   Regents advocate for a revision in the proposed ESSA regulations, or else   face having to intervene in most of the schools in the state,” said Marla   Kilfoyle, Long Island public school parent, educator, and BATs Executive   Director  
"Parents were   very concerned when MaryEllen Elia was named Commissioner, due to her links   to the Gates Foundation in Florida.  Skepticism was withheld to give her   the benefit of the doubt while changes were discussed.  However, her   continued failure to address the concerns of parents have only further eroded   confidence in her leadership and in the State Department of Education,"   said Lisa Rudley, Westchester County public school parent and founding member   of NYSAPE.   
In response to   increases in test refusal, Commissioner MaryEllen Elia attacked critics and   claimed that parents refusing the state tests were unaware of “important”   changes made to the tests. Bianca Tanis, Ulster County Public School parent   and educator said, “The small changes and tweaks made by the NYS Education   Department are simply not enough. Nothing has changed for the individual   child and to suggest otherwise is just plain wrong.” 
Said Leonie Haimson,   Executive Director of Class Size Matters: "Between 2003 and 2009, the NY   State Education Department engaged in rampant test score inflation, by making   the tests and the scoring easier, without admitting this.  After that,   the bubble burst and the scores fell radically with the introduction of   Common Core-aligned exams, when our Commissioner was intent on proving to   parents their children and their schools were failing.  I fear that   state officials are still manipulating the scores for political ends.    It is no wonder that New York parents do not trust these exams to give   an accurate picture of their children’s learning." 
"NYSED must work   more consistently with teachers, parents, and students, to create policy that   supports whole child initiatives in every community. It’s tiresome to   continue to sell our children and families short by engaging annually in   narrow discussions about learning that only focus on ELA and mathematics,   while continuing to neglect science, the arts, and civic engagement,” said   Jamaal Bowman, Bronx public school educator and parent.
"Why would anyone   support tests designed for over 60 percent of students to fail? If a teacher   gave a test in her classroom where over 60 percent failed she would rightly   question the validity of her test. This is insanity," said Tim Farley,   Hudson Valley principal and public school parent. 
It is clear that the   over-emphasis and misuse of test scores with questionable validity and no   educational purpose continue to rob our public schools of valuable   instructional time and resources. Until the leaders of public education in   NYS begin to focus on closing the opportunity gap by addressing the   inequitable resources in our schools and heed the demands of parents and   educators for evidence-based and child-centered educational policies, the opt   out movement will continue to grow. 
| 
2016 Test Refusal Analysis - Public School Districts | |
| 
ELA Tests | 
2016 | 
| 
# of districts -     less than 95% participation | 
648 | 
| 
% less than 95%     participation | 
94% | 
| 
# of districts     -  95% or more participation | 
38 | 
| 
% 95% or more     participation | 
6% | 
| 
Math Tests | 
2016 | 
| 
# of districts -     less than 95% participation | 
655 | 
| 
% less than 95%     participation | 
95% | 
| 
# of districts     -  95% or more participation | 
31 | 
| 
% 95% or more     participation | 
5% | 
| 
Test Refusal increase from ELA to Math | 
2016 | 
| 
# of districts | 
582 | 
| 
% of districts | 
85% | 
| 
Test Refusals by Percent Thresholds | 
% of Districts* | 
| 
20% and over test     refusals | 
72% | 
| 
30% and over test     refusals | 
48% | 
| 
40% and over test     refusals | 
30% | 
| 
50% and over test     refusals | 
19% | 
| 
*Based on NYSED math test opt out figures | |
| 
# of public school districts (includes big five): 686 | |
NYSAPE is a grassroots coalition with over 50 parent and   educator groups across the state.
###
###
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1 comment:
So here we go again. Everyone is patting themselves on the back because on paper it looks like scores improved from 2015 so therefore they want to draw the conclusion that the NYS Common Core Standards are finally beginning to kick in. Yup it was just a bad roll out and whiney teachers, not the standards all these years. Those in power and with financial interests truly want parents to believe this fallacy. The problem is as I understand it, the NYS tests are not normed (not sure if correct term) for year to year comparisons. It's not that well known or understood how these types of tests are scored, but they are not designed to be compared. Each year’s tests are unique and their passing rates are pre-determined by the test makers with direction from the State. LET ME BE MORE CLEAR, THE PASS RATE IS MANIPULATED BY THE STATE AND TEST MAKERS. They can make the tests harder or easier and/or just adjust the pass rate. That is how the State test scores increased so high until the scam was revealed a few years ago. The test makers kept on adjusting the pass rate down year after year giving the perception of big gains. This scoring scam was even used as a way of scaring parents into believing their children were failing when the very first common-core aligned tests were given. The people who make the tests already know within a very small deviation the breakdown of how students will score before students ever take them.
Post a Comment