Showing posts with label NYC Kids PAC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NYC Kids PAC. Show all posts

Thursday, June 8, 2023

Our Parent Action Conference this Saturday, now remote!

Because of the poor air quality, we have decided to move our Annual Parent Conference online, scheduled for Saturday June 1. We're sorry that we can't meet you all in person for the first time since 2019, but it's not worth risking your health.

The new link to RSVP is here. The conference, co-sponsored with NYC Kids PAC, will now begin at 10 AM and because there is no lunch, it is free. If you signed up already, don't worry, we have your email address and will send you the zoom link and a refund. If you didn't yet sign up and want to attend, please do so now.

Again, the conference will feature workshops and breakout rooms on loads of important topics, which you can see at the link above, plus a lead-off session with CM Alexa Aviles talking about her concerns with the Mayor's education budget and what it's like to move from being a PTA president to City Council Member, and a concluding panel of state legislators on how to rein in charter school expansion and abuse.

Again, please sign up now to receive a zoom link tomorrow.

Monday, February 14, 2022

Urge your NY state legislators to put class size caps for NYC into the state budget!

Today Class Size Matters, the Alliance for Quality Education, the Education Law Center and NYC Kids PAC sent the below letter to state legislators, urging them to include class size caps in their one-house budgets, so that the additional state funding our schools are due to receive will be invested in providing NYC students with their right to a sound basic education. 

If you agree, please send your own letter to your state legislators by clicking here.  Thanks! 


Friday, June 21, 2019

Our annual Skinny dinner honoring AG Tish James and NYC Kids PAC was a success!

Attorney General Tish James and me

On Wednesday night, Class Size Matters held our annual Skinny award dinner at Casa La Femme in Greenwich Village.  This year we honored NY Attorney General Tish James and NYC Kids PAC for giving us the real "Skinny" on NYC schools and supporting and amplifying the voices of  public school parents and students.

The food was great and the company sublime.  The Attorney General, Diane Ravitch and Chancellor Rosa all delivered wonderful speeches and it was great fun to share experiences and catch up with allies, friends and colleagues from the past year.

There are lots more photos on the Class Size Matters Facebook page and a few below.




Brooke Parker, Shino Tanikawa,  and Fatima Geidi receiving the Skinny award on behalf of NYC Kids PAC.













Diane Ravitch, education historian and activist, Susan Ochshorn of ECE Policy Works and Carol Burris, executive director of Network for Public Education.





Two of last year's Skinny winners: Fred Smith, testing expert and critic, with Norm Scott, retired teacher, blogger, reporter for The Wave and all-round education activist.



Anita Coley, principal of PS 25 in Bed Stuy with AG Tish James and educators Audrey and Gerri Baker, alumnae of PS 25.









Attorney General Tish James with Alex and Marcus of Teens Take Charge.












 Naftuli Moser of Yaffed, Bronx Borough President education adviser Monica Major with Kim Major Walker and Michael Oppenheimer.









Jeanette Deutermann of LI Opt Out, Lisa Eggert Litvin of NYSAPE, Barbara of New York Coalition to Protect Student Privacy, Jake Jacobs of Badass Teachers Association and Gary Rubinstein, teacher and blogger.

Thanks to everyone who came !  -- Leonie Haimson, Executive Director

Tuesday, June 11, 2019

NYC Parents, kids, advocates, union members and elected officials rally for smaller classes




For Immediate release: June 11, 2019
Contact: Leonie Haimson, leoniehaimson@gmail.com; 917-435-9329

NYC Parents, kids, advocates, union members and elected officials rally for smaller classes

On Tuesday June 11 at noon, more than one hundred parents, students, advocates, elected officials and union members gathered on the steps of City Hall to urge the NYC Department of Education and the Mayor to allocate specific funding in next year's budget towards reducing class size.

The rally was co-sponsored by Class Size Matters, NYC Kids PAC, the UFT, Local 372, the Education Council Consortium, and others.  Among the elected officials who spoke eloquently about the need for the Mayor and Chancellor to reduce class size were Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer, City Council Education Chair Mark Treyger, Council Majority Leader Laurie Cumbo, and Council Members Adrienne Adams, Inez Barron, Barry Grodenchik, and Brad Lander.  

Even though the state’s highest court concluded in 2003 that NYC public school classes were too large to provide students with their constitutional right to a sound basic education, class sizes have actually increased since then, especially in the early grades, where the research is strongest that smaller classes leads to higher achievement and better student outcomes all the way through college and beyond.

Among the other speakers on behalf of the need to fund for smaller classes were Kenneth Cohe,n Regional Director of the NAACP, Maria Bautista of AQE, Benny Lin of the Parent-Child Relationship Association, Eduardo Hernandez of NYC Kids PAC, Shino Tanikawa, co-chair of the Education Council Consortium, Anthony Harmon of the UFT, Donald Nesbit of Local 372 of DC 37,  and Lina Rosario, a 6th grade student in Sunset Park, Kathy Park of Citizen Squirrel and many others.

Leonie Haimson, Executive Director of Class Size Matters, said: “The mayor and the chancellor talk a lot about bringing equity and excellence to NYC schools and some the moves they are making may bring us closer to that goal. But there’s a huge gaping hole in their agenda and that is class size.  Without lowering class sizes there can be neither true equity or excellence in our schools. This fall, more than 330,000 NYC students were crammed into classes of 30 or more.   NYC class sizes are 10-30% larger on average than in the rest of the state.  Classes this large are neither equitable nor excellent, especially as studies show that students of color gain twice the benefit when class sizes are reduced.”



 “Funding for class-size reduction has to become a priority for New York City. Parents and teachers know it has a huge impact on student learning, especially for our most vulnerable populations,” said United Federation of Teachers President Michael Mulgrew.

"Class size reduction is one support that the New York City Department of Education has never fully implemented for students in NYC public schools," said NYC Council Finance Chair Daniel Dromm (D-Jackson Heights, Elmhurst).  "It only makes sense that when there are fewer students in a class, a teacher can individualize their instruction and give students extra support.  More than anything else, this is what our students need.  If we truly want to see our students succeed, we must reduce our class sizes."

“It’s common sense that smaller class sizes help set New York City students up for success,” said Manhattan Borough President Gale A. Brewer. “Funding must be allocated for this important cause—the time to stand up for our students is now.”
 “We urge the Mayor and the City Council to support parents, educators and the community at large by funding smaller class sizes.  Smaller classes have been proven to increase test scores and lowers the need for special education classes” stated Local 372 President Shaun D. Francois I.  “All our children deserve to have access to a sound basic education.  Fund smaller class sizes now.”

 “Many studies have indicated that smaller class sizes lead to better academic outcomes for students. School overcrowding and large class sizes have been a known problem in our school system for far too long. This is a basic equity issue for our students—classes that are too large make it impossible for teachers to provide differentiated instruction and individualized attention, which children need to do their best. I urge Mayor de Blasio and Chancellor Carranza to meet the mandates outlined under the CFE decision, and make a serious commitment to reducing class sizes,” said Council Member Mark Treyger, Chair of the Committee on Education.

Shino Tanikawa, co-chair of the Educational Council Consortium, which represents the parent-led Community District and Citywide Councils, said: “Reducing class size is always number one or number two among parent priorities on the Learning Environment Survey that DOE gives every year.  And yet every year, the issue is ignored by the city in terms of its funding priorities.  It is time for our elected officials to step up to the plate, and deliver for NYC children.”
"We know that smaller class sizes benefit many of our students -- indeed, the NYS Supreme Court determined well over a decade ago that NYC public school classes were too large to give our children the education to which they are entitled. We also know that parents consistently place reducing class size among their top priorities on NYC Dept of Education surveys. It's time to act -- we need to ensure that smaller classes are available for all of our children," said Council Member Helen Rosenthal (Manhattan, District 6).

“As the only NYC political action committee focused solely on the improvement of public schools, NYC Kids PAC looks hard at the record of candidates when it comes to lowering class size,” explained Naila Rosario, President of NYC Kids PAC.  “Progress must be made on this issue, which has not gotten the attention it deserves from either the Mayor or Chancellor.  Expanding Pre-K and providing 3K is fine, but as parents know,  kids need more help once they turn five and more feedback and support from their teachers.  This is impossible in too many schools right now because class sizes are too large. The number of students in the early grades in classes of 30 or more has increased by nearly 3000% since 2007.”



“Ensuring that our kids get the best quality education possible should be a topline priority this budget session and every budget session,” said Council Member Antonio Reynoso. “Every student in New York City deserves access to an excellent public school education. Yet in schools that experience overcrowding, teachers are stretched thin and students cannot receive the personalized attention necessary to foster their educational and emotional wellbeing.  I am proud to support Class Size Matters in advocating for smaller class sizes which have been proven successful at increasing student achievement and help to narrow the opportunity gap.”

“When it comes to New York City public schools, something has to change in a very foundational way,” said Council Member Adrienne Adams. “We need specific funding allocated toward reducing class size as it has an effect on the ability to retain effective teachers, student engagement and overall student success. Reducing class size is the right thing to do for our students and we cannot make excuses when it comes to their future.”
 “New York State made it clear in 2003 that New York City’s class sizes were too large to provide students with the proper attention and resources they need to learn- a violation of their constitutional right. Since then the City’s public school class sizes have not shrunk- they have become larger; which leads me to believe the problem has only grown. I am proud to stand with Class Size Matters, UFT, my colleagues at City Council, and all of today’s local partners and parents to support allocating funding aimed at decreasing the student-to-teacher ratio,” said Council Member Andrew Cohen (Bronx, District 11).

Maria Bautista, Campaign Director of the Alliance for Quality Education, said:  “Parents know that class sizes are too large in NYC public schools for students to get the attention they need.  Research shows that Black and Latino students gain the greatest benefit from smaller classes in terms of achievement, engagement, graduating from high school and attending college.  It’s time that NYC ensured that our students receive the smaller classes they need for their best chance at success.”

 “Why is this administration singularly focused on birth to five to the detriment of all other learners? The biggest risk to our Pre-K students occurs when they enter grades K-3, where too often they’re expected to learn in classes of 30 or more. Yet the DOE insists on pushing more and more Pre-K and now 3K kids into elementary schools that are already overcrowded, which causes our CBO enrollment to drop and threatens our viability.  We implore Mayor de Blasio and the Department of Education to reduce class size in grades K-3 by shifting more Pre-K and 3K students back to CBOs. It would the right thing to do and a win-win for all,” said Brooklyn Pre-K director Alice Mulligan on behalf of CBOs for Equity.


As Diane Ravitch, education historian and President of the Network for Public Education concluded, “Reducing class size is the single most effective school reform. Wealthy parents pay large sums for small classes. We owe small class size to all children.”   

###  


Monday, April 1, 2019

NYC parents and advocates frustrated and angry with results of this year’s state budget for our schools


Contact: Naila Rosario, nailarosario@gmail.com,  917-865-5578
Leonie Haimson, leoniehaimson@gmail.com, 917-435-9329

 NYC parents and advocates frustrated and angry with results of this year’s state budget for our schools

Naila Rosario, President of NYC Kids PAC, said, “We’re very disappointed that the Legislature and the Governor have decided to renew NYC mayoral control for another three years with only minor tweaks, enabling one-man rule to continue.  An additional member to the Panel for Educational Policy will be elected by Community Education Councils and another will be appointed by the mayor, who will keep his supermajority and be allowed to fire any of his appointees at will, as long as he gives a ten-day warning explaining his decision. As a result, the Mayor’s unilateral authority will have no effective checks and balances.  NYC parents, local elected officials and community members will remain as disempowered as before.  There is no reason that something as important as the future of NYC school governance should be rolled into the budget, rather than carefully considered, debated and voted on separately.”

“The failure to fully fund the promise of CFE is also extremely disheartening,” said Leonie Haimson,  Executive Director of Class Size Matters. “Despite the fact that the Assembly and Senate proposed adding $1.2 billion to the education budget as a down payment for the $4.1 billion still owed our schools, instead there will be only a $50 million increase over last year. The state will continue to shortchange NYC schools  by at least $600 million – less than what could have been raised by a tax on pied-a-terre homes.  The only good thing about the education budget is that the Contracts for Excellence program remains – with the smidgen of transparency and accountability that it requires, including NYC’s obligation to lower class size, which parents have sued DOE to carry out.” 

Shino Tanikawa, District 2 parent leader and NYC Kids PAC member concluded: “Parent leaders have asked for amendments to Mayoral control every year since 2015. Thanks largely to Senators Liu and Jackson, this year some of the changes are incorporated.  While I appreciate these small improvements, I am disappointed the legislature did not establish a commission to evaluate the school governance system.  Additionally, I am deeply concerned by the level of Foundation Aid funding.  After the Senate and Assembly one-house budgets, the rug was pulled from right under us and our children will continue to suffer in large classes for another year.  When do we start prioritizing the future of our State by providing a sound basic education to all our children?” 

###

Friday, March 15, 2019

Mayoral control hearings and video: It's time for a change






I just came from the NY Senate hearings on mayoral control, where Senator Shelley Mayer, chair of the Education Committee, Senator John Liu, chair of the NYC Education Committee, and Senators Robert Jackson, Velmanette Montgomery and others asked piercing questions of parents, advocates, community members, as well of Mayor de Blasio and Chancellor Carranza.

To cut to the chase: the Mayor said that he and the Chancellor are "working on being more responsive to parents" and  plan to be more systematic about this in the "next couple of weeks."  This is after he has been in office for five years.

Meanwhile he insisted on a three-year extension of mayoral control to the end of his term; no change in the composition of the Panel on Educational Policy, no change in his ability to fire PEP members at will, and no change in the selection process of the Chancellor to make it more transparent or provide more public input.

Several times the Mayor claimed he had never fired a PEP member for disagreeing with him, which is untrue.  Elzora Cleveland was fired last year as reported here and in City Limits below, for voting against school closures.

Both the Mayor and the Chancellor said they had made terrific progress in "empowering" parents and "listening to them," though no specific examples were given in terms of new policies adopted or decisions made.

Jumaane Williams, our new Public Advocate-elect, spoke concisely and well about the need for municipal control - meaning that the City Council should be empowered to provide checks and balances when it comes to our schools, as they do with all other city agencies but DOE.

Brooke Parker of NYC Kids PAC and I spoke after Jumaane; my testimony is below.  We agreed that municipal control would be an improvement,  as well as giving more authority to CECs to approve school closings and co-locations and changing the composition of the PEP.

After me, Community Education Council District 3 President Kim Watkins and Shino Tanikawa, the co-chair of the Education Council Consortium, the collective of all the CECs, explained how the current system is essentially undemocratic and that parents continue to be shut out of important decision-making when it comes to their children's schools.

Shino, a parent activist for at least 15 years, said that she vehemently opposed mayoral control without checks and balances.  She pointed out that there is no accountability, as the supporters of mayoral control maintained, because there is no real transparency and voters do not vote on education alone.  Moreover, as de Blasio is now in his second term, what choice do voters even have at this point?  We cannot vote him out. She added that all the things that others praised de Blasio for doing, including expanding preK,  could have done with or without mayoral control.
Senator Liu and Senator Jackson asked whether they would support a Commission that could deliberate over the course of one or two years to devise how an improved system of school governance might be structured.
Shino said perhaps, but only if the Commission including CEC members and other parents.  "We need a real conversation that includes parents students and teachers and that results in a system that is truly democratic...We need a system that doesn’t depend on the individual temperament of the mayor."

The most infuriating testimony came from Bob Lowry of the NY State Council of Superintendents and Julie Marlette of the NY State School Boards Association.  Both said that they supported an unrestricted three-year extension of mayoral control with no changes;  not for their own districts of course, but for NYC.  The districts they represent have elected school boards that offer parents and community members real input as opposed to our essentially dictatorial one-man rule.
In my testimony, I tried to counter many of the myths surrounding mayoral control, including great improvements in student outcomes, less corruption and waste, etc. etc..  Our Kids PAC video is at the top of the page.  Our mayoral control fact sheet is here.
Take a look and let your legislators know how you feel.  At this point, it appears that the best chance we have for making a real change is for the State Legislature to create a Commission to examine both the benefits and drawbacks of mayoral control and propose a better system for the future.