Johanna Garcia |
And while DOE and Success Academy claim they only receive student names and addresses for this purpose, they don't explain how charter schools are apparently able to differentially recruit students according to their academic records, as Johanna reported from her own experience, with charters sending her masses of pamphlets and flyers, urging her to enroll one of her three children, but none sent in the names of her other two children, who have IEPs.
The Chalkbeat article cites similar controversies over the non-consensual release of personal student information to charter schools for recruiting purposes in Chicago, Nashville and Memphis, but omits these facts:
- In Nashville and Memphis, elected school boards are refusing to provide student information to charters, despite a state law passed this summer which ordered them to do so. Even after the state launched a lawsuit against them, they are standing fast, and their attorneys argue that the privacy protections and district authority outlined in FERPA supercede the state law. In any case, here in New York, there is no such state law and our state privacy law bars the release of personal student information for commercial purposes.
- In Chicago, after public school student information was disclosed to Noble charter schools without parent consent, resulting in parents receiving postcards urging them to enroll their children in their schools, this sparked a huge controversy and led to an investigation by the Inspector General. As a result, the Chicago staffer who released the information to Noble was fired and the the district apologized to parents in mailings paid for by Noble. And this occurred in a city where the Mayor controls the schools and is openly pro-charter.
Here in NYC, we also have mayoral control, but with a newly re-elected progressive Mayor, who claims to be focused on improving the opportunities of public school students over the interests of charter operators. Yet for some reason, DOE officials are intent on continuing this practice voluntarily, even if it violates federal student privacy law.
That the DOE seems intent on continuing this practice though it began under the previous Mayor is also hard to explain, given how it is aimed at helping the charter schools to expand their “market share” as Eva Moskowitz put it in emails to former Chancellor Joel Klein, which will inevitably lead to further diminishing the funding, space and stability of our public school system.
The release of this information without parental consent also violates specific promises Bill de Blasio made to parents when he first ran for Mayor. See his responses to the NYC Kids PAC 2013 survey here, as recorded by his campaign manager Emma Wolfe, in the midst of the controversy over inBloom:
If the DOE and the de Blasio administration were wise and respected children's right to privacy, they would immediately cease this practice and apologize to parents, as Chicago officials did. At the very least, DOE should be obligated to ask parents for their consent before releasing their children's information to charter schools. Unfortunately, their response to Johanna's FERPA complaint as reported by Chalkbeat signals otherwise, that they intend to dig in their heels and continue to violate the law.
No comments:
Post a Comment