Monday, January 10, 2022

Please sign onto our letter to urge the US Dept of Education's Office of Civil Rights to collect class size data from districts

Update: Just learned that the comment period has been extended, so the dates below have been extended as well.

Many of the most vociferous organizations that focus on the need for more data collection in schools and districts such as test scores have been silent on the need for more accurate and timely class size data, even though this is a  key determinant of student success.  

Research shows that class size matters for all students, but especially for disadvantaged students, who too often are subjected to excessively large classes.  Yet currently, reliable, comprehensive, and timely data on class size is nearly impossible to obtain, especially data that is disaggregated by race, ethnicity and economic status.

Right now, the US Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights is collecting suggestions on what additional district and school data they should collect.   Please consider signing your organization onto this letter, also posted below, sponsored by Class Size Matters and Network for Public Education, urging them to collect specific data on class size.

Not only is this information important for the purposes of public awareness, research, and advocacy, but also requiring districts to collect and report on this data may aid officials in analyzing disparities across schools and help them improve and provide more equitable learning conditions.

If you’d like to sign your organization onto this letter, you can do so by filling in the form here, no later than Thursday, Feb. 10, 2022.

If you don't represent an organization but instead would like to send in comments as an individual, feel free to copy the letter below, and send in your own comments  by January 18 February 11 to the following webpage: https://www.regulations.gov/document/ED-2021-SCC-0158-0041

Thanks! 

 To the Office of Civil Rights:

The educators, researchers and advocates listed below strongly urge the Office of Civil Rights to collect and publish accurate and accessible data on class size, a key driver of educational equity.  Students in smaller classes have improved outcomes in nearly every way that can be measured – including but not limited to better test scores and grades, fewer disciplinary referrals, and higher graduation rates, as rigorous research shows.  

Moreover, those students who receive the greatest benefit from smaller classes are those from disadvantaged groups, including low-income families, students of color, English language learners, and students with disabilities.  Yet currently, the availability of accurate and timely data on class size is sparse at best.  

Thus, districts should be required to report this data in the following manner:

  • The average sizes of actual general education,  inclusion and self-contained special education class sizes reported by grade and disaggregated by category, rather than pupil-teacher ratios.

   

  • The distribution of class sizes by category and grade, including the 25th percentile; the median class size; and the 75th percentile, to be able to analyze disparities across the district.


  • Finally, the data above disaggregated by the following subgroups: race/ethnicity,
    gender, free-lunch, disability, and English Learner status.

Only if such data are reported in this fashion can we begin to analyze whether school districts throughout have provided this critical educational resource in an equitable manner. 

Yours sincerely,

(list in formation)

Leonie Haimson

Class Size Matters

Carol Burris & Diane Ravitch

Network for Public Education

Gene V Glass

Arizona State University

Sandra R. Glass

Arizona State University

Dr. Julian Vasquez Heilig

Kentucky NAACP

Daniel Alicea

Educators of NYC

Susan Spicka

Education Voters of PA

Dan Drmacich

Rochester Coalition for Public Education

Yevonne Brannon, PhD

Public Schools First NC

Rosie Grant

Paterson Education Fund

Jarod McGuffey

Trusted Voices

Danielle Farrie

Education Law Center

Cassie Creswell

Illinois Families for Public Schools

Kathleen Jeskey

Oregon Save Our Schools

Naila Rosario

NYC Kids PAC

New Rochelle Federation of United School Employees

NY State United Teachers*

Sheila Zukowsky

Retiree Advocate Caucus of the United Federation of Teachers*

Mar Fitzgerald

FREE: Families for Real Equity in Education

Terrance Johnson

Community Education Council 16*

Stefanie Siegel

Bailey's Cafe

Maria Hantzopoulos

Vassar College*

Isha Taylor

CEC D10 President, Individual Council Member

Lisa Rudley

NY State Allies for Public Education  

Uniting to Save Our Schools

 

Dr. Jesse P. Turner

Connecticut Badass Teachers

Jeanette Deutermann

Long Island Opt Out

Ann Cook

New York Performance Standards Consortium

Terri Michal

Support Our Students Alabama

Becca Ritchie

Washington BATs admin team

Khoua Vang

ECASD-Locust Lane

Cecily Harsch-Kinnane

Public Education Matters Georgia

Maxine Rappaport

Brooklyn Reading Council

Joann Mickens

Parents for Public Schools, Inc.

Jeanne Melvin

PUBLIC EDUCATION PARTNERS of Ohio

Rebecca Garelli

Arizona Educators United *

Sara Johnson-Ward

Virginia Public Education Partners

Wendy K Marencik

Indiana Coalition for Public Education

Kelley Marlin

Virginia Public Education Partners

Bradley Levinson

Indiana University

Peg Smith and Alice Hawkins

Indiana Coalition for Public Education*

The PS 3 PAC

The PS 3 Charrette School Parent Action Committee


(asterisk means affiliation for informational purposes only)

 


Sunday, January 9, 2022

Talk out of School: Top education stories of 2021, De Blasio record, what we might expect from Mayor Adams, and school safety during the Omicron Surge

Check out our latest Talk out of School podcast:  Daniel Alicea and I recap the top education stories of 2021, discuss the De Blasio record, what we might expect of Mayor Eric Adams, and whether current school safety protocols are strong enough during the Omicron surge.  Please leave your comments below

Thursday, January 6, 2022

Deceptive messaging and multiple gaps in the level of protection from Covid that the DOE is providing students -- but why?

Update 1/7/2022:  Jill Jorgensen did an excellent story last night on NY1 explaining this bizarre formula the DOE is using to determine ho many students to test at each school- the first reporter to do so, to my knowledge. She found that of at 60 of randomly selected 250 schools, fewer than 5% of all students were tested. Check it out.  In the segment, DOE falsely claims that "Our surveillance testing program is the largest in the nation." Of course, NYC is the largest district in the nation.  But they are clearly not testing the most students in any case.  Los Angeles schools tests every student and every teacher each week --over 660,000 kids & over 26,000 teachers. See also this letter to the Mayor, from State Legislators and Council Members, asking for a two week remote option, to allow for improved safety protocols to slow the spread of Covid.

I try to study the health and safety protocols being used in schools, and yet only last night did I realize that the much vaunted doubling of in-school random PCR Covid testing that DOE claimed would start after the holiday break does not really meant what it seems. 

Despite the fact that the NY Times reported that the DOE "plans to ramp up testing from 10 percent of consenting students in each school each week to 20 percent", actually that 20 percent rule only applies to the number of unvaccinated students in each school.  

For example, if a school has 300 students, and 250 are vaccinated, the DOE will only test 10 students  (20% of 50) per week of the total pool of vaccinated and unvaccinated kids who have consented .  This was confirmed by a tweet from Alex Zimmerman of Chalkbeat.

Yet I cannot find this reported nowhere in the media or on the DOE's website. If you can find this explained anywhere, please leave the link in the comment box below. [No longer true; see update above.]

Even some pretty well-informed parents were not aware of this either, like Debra Wexler, who used to work at DOE as a press officer and now works at the Carnegie Foundation; see her tweet below.

This also means that as more students are vaccinated, there is less and less testing each week - which seems counterproductive.

This, along with the low percentage of students who have consented in some schools, means very limited numbers of kids are being  tested each week; in some schools, only a handful. See this from teacher Sara Allen :

 And yet even with the low rate of testing, Covid is so rampant that many schools are  reporting that they are running out of the test kits that kids who are exposed are supposed to receive, and have had to cut back:

According to the DOE "plan", if students are exposed in school, each one is supposed to receive two rapid antigen tests, and then take one test on the first day and the other on the fifth day, to see if they are infected. 

Yet as this Stat article explains, even if someone tests negative on, they may be actually positive and able to transmit the infection to others . If exposed and possibly infected students are getting only one test now because of shortages, what does that mean? 

Meanwhile, in Los Angeles, all students had to test negative before starting school after the holiday break, and as before, all students and staff will continue to be tested weekly, with no opt in or opt out allowed.  In New Orleans, all students must be vaccinated by February 1. Why NYC is unable to provide the same level of protection to its students is beyond me. 

And students unlike teachers are not being provided with high quality masks. See how important high quality masks are (from the Wall Street Journal):

This in the wealthiest city in the world, where the Covid positivity rate as of yesterday was 34.8% . The state as a whole now has the highest rate in the country; and if it were a nation, it would have the second highest rate in the world.

Wednesday, January 5, 2022

Send a letter now to State Officials, urging them to allow online school and district meetings to continue!

 


One of the fe
w good things to come out of the pandemic is an expansion of parent participation in official school-and district meetings by holding these meetings online. Yet the ability to do so is due to expire on Jan. 15.  Resuming in-person meetings at this time is also especially risky, since Omicron still rages. Please send a letter today to state officials to urge them to enable online School Leadership Team and Community Education Council meetings to continue, by clicking here .

Dear community,

The Governor's Executive Order allowing School Leadership Teams and Citywide and Community Education Councils to hold their meetings virtually will expire on January 15th. If nothing is done, these entities will be required to meet in-person starting January 16th.

With the extremely high positivity rate, resuming in-person meetings is not in the best interest of the public (not to mention the volunteer members who serve on SLTs and CCECs).

Please contact the Governor and state legislators today by clicking here and ask them to extend the exemption to the Open Meetings Law and allow SLTs and CCECs to continue meeting virtually. If you have the time, please call your legislators as well. You can look up your Assembly member and Senator by going to https://www.mygovnyc.org/.

Thank you for your activism!

ECC Steering Committee