More on this teacher-less chain of schools, founded by a MacKenzie Price, a Texas businesswoman with no previous experience in education, who claims that her model will "ensure mastery of the material 2-5x faster than traditional method". Peter Greene reported on this woman and her chain of schools when she applied to open up a cyber online charter school, called Unbound Academic Institute Charter School, in Pennsylvania.
The Pennsylvania Department of Education wisely rejected the school, explaining that "the school received no letters of support, was not
insured in any capacity, and pointed to issues relating to how the
school’s address in Lancaster, a coworking space, lacked certain
facility requirements."
The rejection letter also pointed out that "The artificial intelligence instructional model being proposed by this school is untested and fails to demonstrate how the tools, methods and providers would ensure alignment to Pennsylvania academic standards,” an understatement if I've ever heard one.
As Fred Aebli, a professor at Penn State pointed out, "at the end of it all, teaching is by far one of the most human things that we do, especially in K through 12. They’re (kids are) not just learning reading, writing and arithmetic, they’re learning people skills, and life skills.”
Perhaps that's why the proposed daily schedule for the private school in NYC includes an afternoon session devoted to teach "Limitless life skills", such as riding a bike.
But haven't we heard this story before? Remember the Altschools, just a few years ago? The much hyped, high-tech, for-profit private school chain opened with four schools in the Bay Area and in NYC, starting in 2013, and yet closed their doors just a few years later, after losing as much as $174 million in venture capital funds from Mark Zuckerberg & other tech mavens.
Or Summit Learning , another multi- million dollar effort by Zuckerberg, that put kids on computers for much of the school day, with inadequate materials and little human teaching.
After a number of exposes, in the NY Times, the NY Post and elsewhere, showing a huge amount of student and parent discontent with the program, its founder, Diane Taverner, left Summit for other ventures, and the organization renamed itself "Gradient Learning,"
In its recent materials, its operators claim that their program is based on "Whole Student teaching," whatever that means, and that "we've been diligently listening to your feedback and working closely with educators to identify areas to enrich." How many schools have adopted and stuck with the program, versus the countless number that have abandoned it, is unclear.
With the rise of AI, however, we should expect the number of schools and programs claiming great results using this technology will only grow. How much of that will be based on grift and hype, and how much on actual learning will be critical for all of us who care about the future of education to study and carefully dissect. One thing for sure, the Alpha School won't be a shining exemplar of AI's potential.