Sunday, April 22, 2012

NYC principal opting her own children out of testing


Here is a letter from a NYC principal who spoke out against standardized testing and corporate education reform on WNYC radio, when Brian Lehrer had Michelle Rhee as his guest.   She sent the below letter, about opting her children out of testing in the Ridgewood NJ public schools,  to their principals, teachers, the superintendent, the NCLB administrator, guidance counselors, Special Education supervisor, etc. The official response so far has been from the superintendent, who made a veiled threat that she could be reported for truancy for keeping her children out of school on these days. The letter has been slightly revised to omit the names of her children and their schools.
Good afternoon.
 Please be advised that I do not permit my children, to participate in the NJ ASK or any other standardized testing for state report cards and NCLB/RTTT accountability. I believe that this kind of testing is, at best, counter-productive and perhaps even harmful to my children’s education and development. My position is based on my conscientious objection to the State of New Jersey and the U.S. Department of Education employing an early 20th Century assessment model, which reflects the goals, aspirations and knowledge of that time, in order to make high-stakes decisions about the effectiveness of teaching, learning, and schooling today.  This kind of high-stakes testing is not based on what we know about teaching and learning in 2012, nor can it prepare our children for the demands of the 21st Century. The State of New Jersey and the USDOE overstep their bounds and do a disservice to the public when they ignore professionals in local schools by arbitrarily making high-stakes educational decisions based on standardized tests.  Finally, this absurd emphasis on standardized testing depletes valuable tax dollars that could otherwise be spent on improving and supporting teaching and learning.
 As a parent and a 26-year veteran NYC public school educator, children’s development as life-long learners is a top priority.  Educators know that assessment is either for learning or assessment is of learning. Assessments (or “testing”) should always generate feedback that students can apply to their future learning. Professionally, we know that assessment for accountability is wrong.  The NJ ASK gives the Ridgewood Public Schools no information that they don’t already have.  Ridgewood parents and residents insist on excellent public schools. Our local government and our democratic electoral process ensure that we consistently have high performing schools. 
 In urban areas such as Newark, Jersey City, Camden, Paterson, and New York City, high stakes testing for the purpose of school and school district accountability dooms the most needy students to months of intellectually bankrupt classroom experience.  The curriculum narrows in order to ensure that students can respond correctly to multiple-choice questions or formulaic short answer and essay questions.  Timed, one-chance tests subject all children to the perceived possibility of humiliation and failure. This pressure to perform scars children and robs them of their natural curiosity and innate desire to learn.  In fact, our current understanding of the neuroscience of learning indicates strongly that the environment created by high-stakes testing actually inhibits learning.  No Child Left Behind, including New Jersey’s current waiver from the sanctions of that legislation, fails to improve educational outcomes for students.  Ironically, it leaves increased numbers of “minority” subgroups and economically disadvantaged students even further behind. 
My children have had a wonderful experience at [their public schools] in Ridgewood. In fact, I too, am a product of the Ridgewood Public Schools.  As a result of the strong educational foundation established here in Ridgewood, I was able to attend two of our nation’s finest post-secondary institutions in order to pursue my dreams.  Personally and professionally, I must stand with the thousands of courageous parents, schoolteachers and administrators across our nation, who are boycotting high stakes testing.  By opting out of standardized testing, we will deny the USDOE the data that supports its ill-conceived agenda for education reform.  Together we will work to improve public education for all students based on current educational and scientific research. As citizens, it is our responsibility to save our public schools. 
Sincerely, Jean McTavish

Thursday, April 19, 2012

The Pineapple and the Hare: Pearson's absurd, nonsensical ELA exam, recycled endlessly throughout country

There was a ridiculous passage on Tuesday’s 8th grade NY State ELA exam about a Pineapple and a Hare, along with some equally absurd questions.  Here is a comment about the passage from a student:

I had this same story for my 8th grade ELA New York state test! Everybody was talking about it afterward & how it didn't make any sense. I read the story at least 5 times over because i was so confused and the story made no sense to me! Also, the questions that came after it was confusing!

Apparently, the same reading passage and associated questions have been recycled by Pearson for standardized exams in Florida, Illinois, Delaware, New Mexico, Arkansas, Alabama, and perhaps other states, causing huge confusion among students for at least the last seven years. 
There is even a Facebook page about this absurd reading passage and the ridiculous questions that students have been asked about it since 2006; as well as commentary and discussion since 2007 on this blog: In the Break Room: Pineapples Don't Have Sleeves.
Here is the original post of an Illinois parent, named Bryan, in 2007: “Who picks the stories for the ISAT [Ilinois Standardized Achievement Test]? was someone all alone in a dark room, petulantly muttering "I'll show 'em!" 
As another student wrote in 2008 , “The pineapple story is... astounding. How could this even make it past the school board?! Who thought, "Hey! This story makes TOTAL sense?”
In 2009, a different student wrote: “We had this on our eighth grade SATs. It was completely pointless, and none of the answer choices were straightforward. It was insane. “
Another wrote, the same year, “I had that story on my testing today (in Arkansas) i thought it was so stupid, me and my friends couldn't keep ourselves from laughing. seriously, the moral of the story is that pineapples don't have sleeves? That’s nice."
In 2010, a student wrote, “We had the same question on the Delaware Student Testing Program, Delaware’s state test! I was so confused!
And another the same year, “It's on the Alabama test too! When I read it, I just put down random answers since I had no clue.  I'm still confused about the WHOLE thing.
And an Arkansas student the same year, “I had to read this story recently for the Arkansas SAT9 test. I am in the eighth grade and it took every ounce of will power i had to not either a) bust out laughing, or b) yell out "what is this???" in the middle of the test... This was one of the stupidest stories I have ever had to read for a standardized test... though it was definitely the talk of the school after we took the test and everyone got different answers to the questions because, lets face it, there were no good answers... “
And on and on and on. 
Here is the author’s response after being asked about this “random and pointless” story in 2006:
March 22nd, 2006
From: Aaron Smith
Mr. Pinkwater,
This past week we have been taking the ISAT tests (Illinois Standards Achievement Test) and on the reading portion they published on of your stories. That story was "The Pineapple and the Hare." I personally enjoyed it because I like random, pointless stories. Unfortunately, we are not legally allowed to copy any part of the test book. What I am asking from you, is if it would be possible to send me an email with that story, or if possible, a signed copy to my home address.
Daniel replies:
I don't have a copy--don't even remember writing it. Evidently I knocked it out for money from whoever makes up those tests. The good news is that all of my stories are random and pointless.
Here, again, is the story if you’d like to read it.
From various reports, these appear to be two of the questions:  
Why did the animals eat the pineapple?
a. they were annoyed
b. they were amused
c. they were hungry
d. they wanted to
            Who was the wisest animal?
a.    the hare
b.    the moose
c.     The crow
d.    The owl

The ONLY right answer is Pearson; for getting paid $32 million from NY State for these recycled, annoying and pointless exams, which the NY Times said they had promised to be "less tricky"! Not to mention the millions of dollars the company is reaping from selling the associated test prep materials in our state.  [See also comments from teachers and principals about how confusing and ambiguous the ELA exams  were in other grades this year.]

 As a NYS student wrote on Tuesday:
I also took the test today, and it also baffled me. ….Unfortunately, this was an atrocious question. All the options have substantial evidence that can bolster them. With any luck, this portion of the examination was a field test and did not count.
But why put a reading passage with questions so nonsensical on a state standardized exam, either as a “field test” question or for any other purpose? Especially given the high-stakes nature of these exams, which will be used in NYC to decide which students to hold back, the school's grade on the progress reports, and in the near future, as in integral part of the new statewide teacher evaluation system.
A story that makes no sense and with questions that apparently have no right answer could wreck the confidence of any student on the first day of a strenuous three day ELA exam –was this what it was designed to do so?
 As another  NY student wrote two days ago:
 i also had this for nys ela test and the only thing anyone could talk about today was Who was the wisest? even some of the teachers got into the debate! i choose the moose bc he seemed the wisest but i still dont get it and no1 else does, not even my ela teacher! It seems like it was written by a 4th grader i thought it was a joke when i first read it. oh well looks like everyones gonna b in ais [Academic Intervention Services] English next year....

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

NYS educators agree: Flawed, confusing and misleading ELA exams


This week, NY students in grades 3-8 are in the midst of taking lengthy ELA exams, which in NYC, will help determine whether they will be held back, and what schools they will attend in the future, as well as what grades their schools receive and how their teachers will be evaluated.  See this article by Juan Gonzalez, about how our kids this year are  spending 270 minutes on the ELA exam and 270 minutes on the Math exam — 90 minutes over each of six days.  No wonder a growing number of parents are choosing to opt their kids out of these exams. ( For more on this, see With Test Week Here, Parents Consider the Option of Opting Out – NYT/SchoolBook and Parents keeping kids out of state reading exams - NY Daily News.)
What follows are comments from teachers and principals throughout the state about how this year's ELA exams are flawed, and contain many ambiguous and misleading questions.  Unfortunately, parents will NEVER be allowed to see these tests as the state is determined to keep them secret from this day forward.  And yet, NYS taxpayers are paying $32 million to Pearson for these exams.  If you are a NYC parent or a teacher, and want to get active on this issue, please email changethestakes@gmail.com  Please also add your comments below if you have thoughts or observations about these exams.

3rd grade test:

From a NYC teacher: A couple of crazy things I've noticed: one really misleading fact/opinion question on the 3rd grade test (question asks "which sentence from the story is an opinion?" and the correct answer choice has the opinion embedded within a piece of dialogue. There's another that asks "what is the best way to remember what is in this ad?" that is highly subjective (different people have different strategies for recalling information, and each of the choices has some validity). 
NYC principal: The listening selection for grade 3 has MANY questions (multiple choice, short response, extended response) that follow this incredibly thin selection and aren't necessarily answered in the selection.

4th grade test:

 From a literacy specialist [in a district outside NYC]:  I proctored the fourth grade test today. I thought that the test was terrible and not a true measure, in my opinion, of reading comprehension. First, some of the early passages in the test were very long (more than two pages) and meandering, making it difficult for 8/9 year-old readers to clearly discern the principal problem among several - or the problem the test-maker thought was the principal problem. These long passages put an undue burden on young reader's stamina during the early part of the test. Even though I am an adult who reads a lot (I am currently finishing my doctoral dissertation),  I found getting through the long passages and questions mentally tiring. This was in part due to the fact that the questions were convoluted and designed to "catch" students in test traps.
In addition, some of the test's print features were inconsistent (i.e., same exact phrases were bolded in some question and not others). The word choice both in the question stem and in the answer choices was meant to obscure meaning, choosing at times arcane vocabulary to refer to text information in the correct choices.  I have been a teacher for 19 years and a literacy specialist for 13, and I can say with some degree of confidence that this test was unfair and not a good instrument to measure students’ ability to read proficiently and use complex text to think critically and learn about the world. I feel sad for my wonderful and hard working students who sat for 90 minutes running through an unfair reading rat maze for political antics and for the benefit of corporate profiteers. I am afraid for the profession I love and for the future of public education.
From a principal, outside NYC:  This morning I had a fourth grader who told me that yesterday’s test was “hard.”  She then went on to explain that the stories were fine and the questions were easy, but that the answers didn’t match the questions.  Sometimes all the answers seemed right, other times all the answers seemed wrong, and sometimes the answers were just confusing.

5th grade test:

NYC principal: As angry as I was before, seeing the tests today (which we are not allowed to quote in any way) has sent me over the edge!  I haven't even read all of them yet but the fifth grade test is unbelievable.  There were easy reading selections and lots of trick questions--more than I have ever seen before--that are absolutely no indication of any kind of 5th grade level reading comprehension.  My APs and I can't even figure out what answer they are looking for in some questions!  I think we absolutely need to fight that these tests be made public.  People will be shocked to see them.  
NYC teacher [at another school]: I completely agree with that principal.   Passages were dense, though reasonable.  What was irritating was how many questions were trick questions, and don't really test comprehension, they test your ability to answer tricky questions.   There were definitely questions in which my kids were just making silly mistakes all on their own.  But there were also plenty of questions in which the wording was meant to lead you astray, or there were 3 perfectly viable answers for which you had to use really developed reasoning to distinguish which was best, and honestly, I don't think a 9 year-old should be told they aren't worthy of passing fourth grade just because their reasoning hasn't reached an adult's level of analysis, or because they took a different perspective on a question than a test monger.

6th-8th grade tests:

NYS middle school principal [outside NYC]: As I reviewed the exams for the sixth through eighth grade yesterday, I was appalled. I felt that sixth grade was the most difficult of the three exams, followed by eighth and with the fairest exam being the seventh grade. There were so many questions that contained answer choices that the ELA teachers said they could not decide which answer would be 'best' (By the way - weren't they getting rid of using that in the question stem?). I felt terrible for my children, especially for my English Language Learners and my special education students. They were extremely frustrated by the ambiguity of the answer choices and the questions that required them to synthesize several different pieces of information to come up with one answer that was mysteriously lurking among the four choices.
I had one student in an ESL class, who I was told was bright and could do well (whatever that means since the cut off scores are manipulated each year), tell me he was finished at 8:30 AM - the test started at 7:50 AM. As we strongly encouraged that he go back into the test to check his answers - his eyes began to well with tears. He was frustrated and gives up easily to not deal with the frustration. My heart broke. I can't imagine his willingness to now sit for another two days with each day bringing him more and more frustration. That's like me sitting for an IB language assessment. I'm motivated to learn the language, but I know I'm not proficient, I know I'm going to fail and I have to sit for it any way. Why should I try?

Monday, April 16, 2012

Kindergarten wait list crisis continues: what we know and don't know


The Kindergarten waiting lists were released, and they are nearly as long as last year.  See map below and chart to the right. (You can also compare to last year's maps, though they are not directly comparable; more on this below.)

According to DOE, there are  2406 zoned Kindergarten children wait-listed for their zoned neighborhood school this year, compared to 2588 last year.  (The reason last year's figure differs slightly from the one reported in the media is because I removed the double-counting of PS 3 and PS 41 wait lists,which they share; the DOE double-counted them last year but not this.)

Here is a brief summary: 21 districts have wait lists for Kindergarten.   The districts with the longest waiting lists are D24 in Queens (454); D2 in Manhattan (330); D15 in Brooklyn (270); and D25 (175); D30 (152); and D28 (151), all in Queens.

As usual,  Queens is the most overcrowded borough , with the total number of wait-listed zoned children larger than last year, as in Brooklyn and the Bronx.  The schools with the longest wait lists are in Brooklyn and Queens, and these schools are all more overcrowded than last year as well.


Now for what we don't know:

  • This year, the DOE refused to tell us how many siblings were on wait lists, though they did this the last two years, making one suspect that this number is even larger than the total of 3036 sibs plus zoned K students there were in 2011 at this time.
  • Nor do we know how long the overall waiting lists really are, including non-zoned students, which likely total many thousands more.  Meanwhile, the charter lobby as well as DOE always publicize the thousands of students on the charter waiting lists, in order to  rationalize unfettered charter expansion, but the public has never been able to know how many children there are on waiting lists for our regular public schools. 
  • Nor do we know in how many schools class sizes will have to rise to or above the contractual level to make room for all these new students; how many new Kindergarten sections will have to be added, leading to larger class sizes in the upper grades, or how many preK programs, art and science rooms and other specialty or intervention spaces will be eliminated.  
  • Nor will we ever find out how many families will decide to move out of the city because of the stress and the uncertainty of not knowing where their children will attend school next year.
At the same time, nearly 5,000 Kindergarten students tested "gifted" this year, with vanishing little space to put them. Because of overcrowding, there are also far fewer between zone or district transfers now than in the pre-Bloomberg era, when this method of parent "choice" allowed for more diversity, especially in middle class neighborhoods.    Now this option has been nearly entirely shut down, with the overcrowding conveniently playing into the hands of the charter lobby, the corporate reform crowd, and Bloomberg's preference for charters: fewer "choices" remain, except for charter schools run by private corporations.

If you point at the map, you can see the name of the school and the number of zoned students on the wait list.   If your child is on a wait list for next year, or you have any more information about the real figures, including siblings or non-zoned waitlisted children, please add this below.  thanks!

125 schools, 2406 zoned Kindergarten children as of March 2012:





Sunday, April 15, 2012

NYC Teacher supports parents opting their children out of standardized testing and wishes she could as well!


As we have spoken out against high-stakes testing this year, after our family was first directly affected by it through our third-grade son, we have had the wonderful experience of connecting with like-minded parents in New York and across the country who are also determined to put education back into the hands of educators.
We have also heard from many teachers who, unlike parents, are often under the direct threat of being fired for speaking out against run-away testing in our schools. We would like to put forward, with her permission, the thoughts of one such teacher working in Brooklyn. What follows are her words, taken from our recent correspondence with her, with comments from us interspersed in italics.
We wish this teacher’s experiences were unusual. But increasingly this is the norm in our public schools. Professional educators across the country are being prevented from exercising their best professional judgment and are actually punished for responding to children as individuals --all in the name of “standards” and “accountability.”
Our position is simple: we want our children to be educated by teachers like this one, who care about children and learning, who recognize and protest counterproductive teaching methods that are forced on them by the state. We will not rest until parents and teachers are once again in charge of education policy, and teachers are free to use their knowledge and expertise to make learning the joyous experience it should be for all our children.
If you are interested in this issue, please attend the forum Tuesday night, April 17, at 5:30 pm, on the new teacher evaluation system and high-stakes testing at Murry Bergtraum HS; more info at the Changes the Stakes website. – Anne Stone and Jeff Nichols
Dear Mr. Nichols and Ms. Stone,
I would like to thank you for speaking out against standardized testing and making the courageous choice to opt-out of the tests. In my eight years as a NYC Public School teacher, I have seen that the tests are patently unfair and detrimental to real learning. I have half-jokingly said many times that the ELA tests are a part of a conspiracy to make kids hate reading. Make eight-year-olds sit at a desk for an hour and a half without talking or getting up, reading "passages" that may or may not be relevant or interesting to them, and answering questions they are told have only one correct answer - even when those questions are subjective ("which detail is the most important?") or debatable ("why did the author include dialogue in the fourth paragraph?"). Ever since my school made me attend the most recent "Test Prep Workshop" at Teachers College, I have fantasized about all of my students committing an act of civil disobedience and handing in blank tests. I doodle print/web ad campaigns targeted at kids across the city to discourage them from taking the tests ("STATE TESTS CAUSE COOTIES! PENCILS DOWN, KIDS!").
I am still weighing the potential for change against the probable loss of my job and teaching license, but if there is anything that I can do to help your cause, or any suggestions that you can offer me to help mobilize parents in my school, please let me know.
After this initial contact, she shared with us a letter she sent out to friends of hers, referring to her having joined our parent group:
Never content to "leave things be," I've become involved with a group of parents in NYC who feel that the over-reliance on standardized testing is both dumbing down education and perpetuating socioeconomic inequality. These parents have chosen to protest the tests by keeping their children home on test days or by asking their children to hand in blank tests. They feel that since punitive measures for noncomplying or underperforming teachers and schools are built into the premise of high-stakes testing, the responsibility to change the system lies first and foremost with the parents. When I asked them how I can help, they suggested that I share my story with any non-educator friends who will listen, and hope that they will speak out since - unlike me - they have nothing to lose. So, here goes nothing: 
At my own school, the Extended Day enrichment programs in Art, Music, and Social Studies were recently put on hiatus for eight weeks so that students and teachers could conduct mandatory "test prep" during that time. This decision was made by the administration without consulting teachers, students, or parents. The groupings for these test prep periods were created and assigned based on the results of ONE predictive assessment. So, for example, a 3rd grader who reads above grade level but has oppositional defiance disorder and filled in all the wrong bubbles on purpose, was placed in the same group as another 3rd grader with multiple cognitive delays who reads at a Kindergarten level.
Even more egregiously, the "learning objectives" during these test prep periods were mandated by the administration based on this same data, with no input from teachers or consideration of how the question was asked. For example, I was told that based on the data I MUST teach my group of students how to identify details in a text that support a main idea, because "they all got question 10 wrong" - never mind that question 10 asked students to write a full essay based on a nonfiction article, something that has never been taught in 3rd grade and is not part of the state standards OR the Common Core Learning standards for that grade level. (Our staff developer from Teachers College said that it was most likely included as a "pilot" question for future years' tests). It's unlikely that none of these kids know how to identify supporting details and far more likely that these kids had no idea what to do when they were confronted with two full blank lined pages. 
This year's New York State English Language Arts test asks students as young as seven years old to sit for 90 minutes straight reading passages and answering multiple-choice questions. Students are allowed one five-minute break, during which they may not talk or look at each other, and are to be strongly discouraged from using the restroom (this information was shared by a staff developer who had spoken to people on the state level). Even more absurd, the state strongly recommends that students with disabilities who receive extended time as a testing accommodation take the full time completing the test, and proctors should not end the testing period early even if students claim to be finished - which means that students with autism, ADHD, dyslexia, cognitive delays, and/or emotional disturbance are being subjected to a three-hour block of testing, three days in a row, for two successive weeks.
This last observation speaks to a major issue parents and teachers are raising: the testing “accommodations” for special-education students have the perverse result that children with attention problems are compelled to concentrate for twice as long as their neurotypical peers. But for “typical” kids the testing experience can also be overwhelming. In a subsequent letter, this teacher shared with us an anecdote that says it all:
The topic of the test came up during a reading lesson a few weeks ago, before "test prep" officially began. One boy in my class put his head down and started crying. I took him out of the room to talk to him after the lesson. He said that he doesn't like talking about the test because he's worried he might fail. This boy is highly intelligent, reads above grade level, and qualified for a g/t program. I told him that there was no reason he had to worry - that the test is just a reading test and he's an excellent reader. Unfortunately the principal was in the vicinity and she chewed me out the next day for the way I responded to the boy. She told me that I needed to tell him that it's up to him whether he passes or fails - whether he takes the test seriously or chooses to fool around!

Nightline on test prep & the gifted exams: more "choices" for parents or magnifying social inequities?

The results of the Gifted and Talented exams are in, and according to the NY Times, more than half of the children tested in wealthier districts like District 2 and District 3 were found to be "gifted", while only six children made the grade in District 7 in the South Bronx.  Why the disparity?

Are these tests merely a way of sorting children by race and class, as Debbie Meier pointed out in 2007, when Klein first proposed to base all admissions to gifted programs on the basis of high stakes exams, or do the results really reflect children's inherent abilities?  And does the proliferation of G and T programs across the city help or hinder the goal of equity and systemic reform?

We have written often about the severe problems with the way this program has been implemented in NYC, including how we believe it works to magnify inequities, as well as about the continued pro-administration bias of reporting on this issue here.

Check out these segments from a recent Nightline investigation, aired April 14, including interviews with anxious NYC parents enrolling their four-year-olds in arduous test prep programs, because they believe that if they can get their kids into these programs they will be set for life, as well as an interview with Chancellor Walcott, who expresses no concern that some  parents may be paying four or five thousand dollars to prep their children for the test, because he says this gives them more "choices." Walcott also evinces a surprising lack of skepticism, given the extreme racial disparity in the results, that these exams  test actual giftedness rather than economic and social privilege.

video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player



video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player

video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player