See letter from most of the Elementary school principals in Community School District 2 below; D2 takes up a large slice of Manhattan from the southern tip to 96 St. on the East Side and the 50's on the West Side, with a small chunk of the Lower E. Side taken out.
Note: the letter mentions "product placements": Among the trademarked products in the ELA exams this year were not just Nike and Barbie mentioned below; but also Lifesavers, Ipods, Mug Rootbeer, Singer Sewing Machines, IBM and FIFA, trademark of the International Soccer Federation, each with the TM after their name and below the reading passage. Mug Rootbeer, Fifa and IBM were also in the exams last year.
Community
Action: Join Principals in Speaking Out Regarding the NYS English Language Arts Exam Friday,
April 11th, at District 2 Schools
Dear District 2 Families,
Community School District 2 represents
a richly diverse group of school communities and it is not often these days
that we have an opportunity to join in a shared effort. Last week, and for several weeks prior, every
one of our upper grade classrooms devoted hours of instructional time, vast
human resources, and a tremendous amount of thoughtful effort to preparing
students to do well on the NYS ELA exams and, ultimately, to administering
them. Only a handful of District 2 families
even considered opting out, and we are not advocating families do so, specifically
because we believe our students are well prepared for the rigor and high
expectations of the Common Core and our schools have worked hard for several
years to adjust our curriculum and teaching to support students in meeting
those expectations.
We had high hopes for what this year’s tests would bring
and assured families that they would reflect the feedback test makers and state
officials had received from educators and families regarding the design of the
test following last year's administration.
Our students worked extremely hard and did their very best. As school leaders, we supported teachers in
ensuring that students and families kept the tests in perspective – they were
important, but by no means the ultimate measure of who they are as readers,
students, or human beings. We encouraged them to be optimistic, and did our
best to do the same. Frankly, many of us
were disappointed by the design and quality of the tests and stood by
helplessly while kids struggled to determine best answers, distorting much of
what we'd taught them about effective reading skills and strategies and
forgoing deep comprehension for something quite different.
Last Friday morning, Liz Phillips, the
principal of PS321 in Brooklyn, led her staff and her parent community in a
demonstration objecting, not to testing or accountability or high expectations
for kids, but to these tests in particular and, importantly, to their high
stakes nature for teachers and students, and the policy of refusing to release
other than a small percentage of the questions.
500 staff and parents participated.
By Friday evening some officials were
dismissing the importance of their statement, claiming that Liz and her
community represented only a tiny percentage of those affected, implying that
the rest of us were satisfied. Given the
terribly high stakes of these tests, for schools, for teachers and for kids,
and the enormous amount of human, intellectual and financial resources that
have been devoted to them, test makers should be prepared to stand by them and
to allow them to undergo close scrutiny.
Many District 2 schools will be
holding demonstrations this week, making sure our thoughts on this are loud and
clear and making it more difficult to dismiss the efforts of one school. On Friday morning, April 11th, at 8:00am, we
invite our families and staff to join District 2 schools in speaking out,
expressing our deep dissatisfaction with the 2014 NYS English Language Arts LA
exams and the lack of transparency surrounding them.
Among the concerns shared
by many schools are the following: The tests seem not to be particularly
well-aligned with the Common Core Learning Standards; the questions are poorly
constructed and often ambiguous; the tests themselves are embargoed and only a
handful of select questions will be released next year; teachers are not
permitted to use (or even discuss) the questions or the results to inform their
teaching; students and families receive little or no specific feedback; this
year, there were product placements (i.e., Nike, Barbie) woven through some
exams. We are inviting you and your family to join together as a school
community in this action, helping to ensure that officials are not left to
wonder whether our silence implied approval.
Yours truly, District 2 Principals
Adele Schroeter, PS59; Lisa Ripperger,
PS234; Robert Bender, PS11; Tara Napoleoni, PS183; Jane Hsu, PS116; Sharon
Hill, PS290; Amy Hom, PS1; Lauren Fontana, PS6; Jennifer Bonnet, PS150; Nicole
Ziccardi Yerk, PS281; Susan Felder, PS40; Alice Hom, PS124; Nancy Harris,
PS397; Kelly Shannon, PS41; Nancy Sing-Bok, PS51; Lisa Siegman, PS3; Irma Medina, PS111; Terry Ruyter, PS276; Medea
McEvoy, PS267; Darryl Alhadeff, PS158; Samantha Kaplan, PS151; David Bowell,
PS347; Lily Woo, PS130; Jacqui Getz, PS126; Kelly McGuire, Lower Manhattan Community MS
4 comments:
I reached out to my daughter's principal when I saw this posted on Diane Ravitch's blog bc I was curious that he was not on the list. But from your intro it seems that this is an elementary action--although there is one MS tacked on at the end. Is that the case? Our middle school, citywide, but physically in D2 would stand by these principals. The approach to the tests at ICE was different, however, from what the principals outline in their letter: no test prep and 75% test refusal!
From what I was told by our principal, middle school principals were asked and encouraged to join as well! So yes, I would definitely suggest inquiring further
A peripheral testing issue (cute parody):
http://cheezburger.com/8150466048
Post a Comment