This lawsuit filed today is based on many of the same arguments as a previous lawsuit filed in March to block the co-locations of two charter schools in Brooklyn and Queens. These proposals do not take into account the need to lower class size to the levels required by the new class size law; moreover the Educational Impact Statements do not actually analyze the likely impact on the education of these students, many of them over-aged and under-credited if this re-location and co-location occur, especially those students with special needs. The votes of the PEP to approve these changes also violated Open Meetings Law in several ways. The press release and links to all the legal filings are below.
For immediate release: Thursday, June 22, 2023
More information: Laura Barbieri, lbarbieri@advocatesny.com, 914-819-3387
Sarah Frank, sarfrank@gmail.com, 617-838-2032
Lawsuit filed to block the re-location of West Side High School
and the co-location of Brownsville Academy -
both transfer schools with vulnerable overage and undercredited students
Today, Thursday, June 22, 2023, a lawsuit was filed in
the New York State Supreme Court on behalf of parents, students, and teachers
to prevent the NYC Department of Education from forcing the Edward A. Reynolds
West Side High School from moving across town to a smaller building and to
block Brownsville Academy from having to share its building with another
school, Aspirations Diploma Plus High School.
Both of these schools are transfer schools, designed to
ensure that vulnerable, over-aged and under-credited students have the support
they need to remain in school through graduation. Many of these students have
already dropped out of school once or are at increased risk of dropping out in
the future, so any negative change in their learning environment jeopardizes
their life chances.
The lawsuit, filed by the pro bono law firm Advocates for
Justice, focuses on the inadequacy of the Educational Impact Statements [EIS’s]
that the NYC Department of Education is required to prepare in advance of the
votes by the Panel for Education Policy to approve these changes in school
utilization that occurred on April 19, 2023, and May 1, 2023.
Instead, both EIS’s for these proposed changes in school
utilization explicitly assumed that current class sizes at both schools would
continue indefinitely, even though half of the classes at Brownsville Academy
and more than half of the classes at Edwards A. Reynolds West Side High School
are larger than the cap of 25 students per class required by the new state
class size law, to be phased in over five years.
In addition, students with disabilities in both schools
will likely lose their dedicated rooms for mandated services in these new, far
more limited spaces. Both schools have very high percentages of such students:
43% at Edward A. Reynolds West Side High school and 26%
of the students at Brownsville Academy have disabilities.
The failure of the EIS’s to analyze the profound
educational impacts of these changes is a clear violation of state education
law, and in an innovative legal strategy, the lawsuit also argues that the
deprivation of critical space from students with disabilities would cause
a disparate impact on these vulnerable students, in violation of the New York
City Human Rights Law.
Most egregiously, perhaps, is how the students at Edward
A. Reynolds West Side High School will be deprived of their on-site GED
program, their full-size gym, the Ryan health care center, and the LYFE
day-care center, designed to take care of the young children of these overaged
students while they are attending school. Yet the DOE fails to assess the
likely negative educational impacts of these profound losses, or even
acknowledge them in the EIS.
Also highly questionable is the way in which the DOE and
certain members of the Panel for Educational Policy ignored their
obligations under the Open Meetings Law (OML). Specifically, the law requires
that all voting by members of public bodies must be publicly performed.
However, many of the Mayor-appointed PEP members failed to turn on their
cameras during the meetings that approved these changes in school utilization,
which should nullify their votes. In addition, the DOE failed to record the
first several hours of the PEP meeting on May 1, which is also an OML
violation. Together, these violations call into question whether
these PEP proceedings or their votes were legally valid.
State Assemblywoman Latrice Walker said:
““I have long been concerned about the plan to re-site Aspirations Diploma Plus
and co-locate it with Brownsville Academy High School. Though well-intentioned,
the proposal would harm two communities. Aspirations is the only transfer school
in Crown Heights, and I fear they will lose scholars who are not willing to
travel to Brownsville. I also share the concerns of the staff at Brownsville
Academy, who are worried about the potentially drastic reduction in the number
of rooms. The co-location process would deprive the Brownsville Academy of the
space currently being used for counseling, an internship program, and their
very successful mentoring services. Brownsville Academy has served the
community and its students well, consistently ranking in the top 10 in
graduation rates, attendance, and career readiness for transfer schools in the
city. The potential impact on the student-to-teacher ratio and the reduction of
services would have an adverse impact on some of Brooklyn’s most vulnerable students.”
“I strongly support West Side High School staying where it is and appreciate the effort by Advocates for Justice to halt the move,” said Council Member Gale A. Brewer. “It is inequitable to take away from the student population the LYFE Center, the wellness and health center, the large gym and field, and the kitchen. If the TYWLS building is not adequate to meet the needs of its current student population, then it cannot be adequate for the students now at West Side High School.”
“The relocation of West Side High School and the co-location of Brownsville Academy presents a number of challenges to the families, students, and teachers in both schools.” Said New York City Council Deputy Speaker Diana Ayala. “Students within these schools have either dropped out once before or require special accommodations to ensure they receive a quality education. The Department’s relocation plan does not take those factors into consideration and their decision further jeopardizes the educational prospects of the students within these schools. I urge the Department to reconsider this decision and to work with both schools to find a compromise that focuses on the students rather than the ideal location.”
Added Ashley Norman, a plaintiff, a parent of a current
student at West Side High School and herself a graduate of the school: “West Side has paved the way for so many students in its
time. Myself and everyone I know felt as if dropping out would be the best
option, until we went to this school. They do their best to meet you where you
are and push you for greatness. This school is so important for young parents.
You can receive your education, have your child cared for, and receive not only
mental health care but your physical healthcare as well in the Ryan Center
-things that being a young parent are hard to juggle. I decided to participate
in this lawsuit because I also worry about the potential for gang violence on
the East side that our kids might be exposed to. I believe this school NEEDS to
stay here for the benefit and more importantly the safety of our community.”
Lucie Gaba, a plaintiff and parent at
Brownsville Academy commented: “Before attending Brownsville, my son attended
another high school where he struggled with attendance issues and with being on
time. Since switching schools, his attendance has improved and the wonderful
staff have inspired him to become an active member of the school
community. Brownsville Academy has helped my son improve his academics
greatly. I am worried that the co-location will make it harder for him and his
friends to get the dedicated help they have come to count on. English is his
second language and he receives extra services for this reason. I am very
concerned that if the co-location happens, the increased crowding will cause
him to lose these services.”
Grisslet Rodriguez, plaintiff and parent of
a current West Side High School student, said: “I’m participating in this
lawsuit because it is the right thing to do for all of the students in West
Side High School. I want to be a voice for my son and all the West Side
students since their voices are not being heard. My concern is that if our
students are moved to another location, the outcome is going to be devastating.
It will have a negative impact on a minority group that already struggles.
Students might drop out, have emotional damage, and more mental health
challenges. My top concern is the lack of safety in the neighborhood that is on
the East side and is dangerous. The new location across town will require many
students, including my son, to take a bus and a train, which is a longer
commute. Health-wise, there is no gym and no clinic, which is so important for
the health, well-being, and growth of the students. The daycare center is
crucial to keep the young mothers in school. I hope students can remain in West
Side High School, where they feel safe. These students have been through a lot,
and we are so proud of them and happy that they found a place where they feel
they belong.”
Sarah Frank, teacher at West Side High
School and a plaintiff, said: “We have been pushing back on this relocation
from the moment it was announced because as a transfer school, we know our
vulnerable students need access to smaller classes and additional services and
support. Our current building was specifically designed for West Side
High School in the 1990s to have an on-site daycare and health clinic. Our
Public School Athletic League teams play in our beautiful gym and the field
adjacent to the school. The building we are being relocated to on the East Side
has none of these resources, and traveling to other locations for daycare,
healthcare, and athletics is a huge barrier for our students. While we have had
enrollment struggles, our enrollment has grown tremendously in the last few
months. The new space will not allow us to meaningfully lower class size and
will not afford the space for small groups and other social-emotional supports
we have always offered our students, particularly the nearly 50% of our special
needs population with IEPs. Our students do not gain anything from this
move, they only lose.”
Marissa
Moore, a plaintiff, and parent at Brownsville Academy HS pointed out:
“Brownsville Academy has provided my son with a rigorous academic experience
along with rich social emotional support which is so needed coming out of the
pandemic. Under the co-location proposal, I am concerned that BAHS will become
overcrowded and offer fewer services just like the larger schools which failed
to serve him previously.”
Concluded Hon. Carmen Quinones, President of the Frederick Douglass Houses Association where many of the students who attend West Side High School live, “This is not what Justice looks like: putting a target on our children's back and making them choose to drop out of school or die trying!”
Here are
the Memo of Law ; Verified Petition, and
affidavits from Lucie Idiamey-Gaba, Sarah Frank, Anneris Fernandez , Chance Santiago, Marissa-Moore, Grisslet Rodriguez, Ashley Norman, and Leonie Haimson.
###
2 comments:
I'm so happy a law suit was filed. A wrong decision was made by the PEP Panel. Hopefully it will be corrected. West Side High School deserves to stay where it is.
There should be a lawsuit against every co-located charter school, in every public building.
Post a Comment