Showing posts with label video. Show all posts
Showing posts with label video. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 10, 2016

video: the irreplaceable Juan Gonzalez talks about some of his greatest hits

Investigative reporter Juan Gonzalez is retiring from the Daily News after 30 or more years. Here is the speech he gave at a party for him at DC 37 tonight.  He starts off saying, after being on the Young Lords, he was never afraid. He'd already been arrested, tear gassed and beaten; what else could they do but fire him? And he could always get another job.

He goes onto to recall the back stories behind covering the general strike in the Dominican Republic, the attempt to suppress his reporting on the health effects of 9/11, and the irony of the massive corruption of CityTime under Bloomberg.  Take a look!


Juan Gonzalez speech 5.10.16 from Class Size Matters on Vimeo.

Sunday, February 14, 2016

The growing storm around Success Academy




On Friday morning, the NY Times ran a story and posted the video above, a minute and 16 seconds of a teacher berating a first grade child at the Cobble Hill Success charter school in Brooklyn, ripping up her page of math work, and sending her to sit on the “calm down” chair.  This video has gone viral, with an apparently greater impact than all the news articles, complaints, and lawsuits filed against Success charters in the past few years.  

There have been so many documented instances of students unfairly treated and pushed out of Success charter schools that it is difficult to know where to start.   One of the first parents to tell her story of how her special needs son was pushed out of a Success charter school in Kindergarten within a few weeks of the beginning of the school year was Karen Sprowal, in a Michael Winerip column in  the NY Times in July 2011 – nearly five years ago.  We followed up with Karen’s own account on our blog here.

Over the years, Juan Gonzalez of the Daily News has repeatedly chronicled the many documented instances of young children repeatedly suspended and ejected from Success Charters.  For the first time, the NY Times started critically covering the school last spring, describing their high-pressured test prep tactics and severe disciplinary practices for the purpose of achieving high scores on the state exams.

This fall, PBS ran a segment about the suspensions of young children at the Success Academy Charter Schools. You can see the segment here.  Fatima Geidi spoke about the way the school had repeatedly suspended her first grade son for minor infractions, and refused to provide him with the special education services he was entitled to.  While the reporter, John Merrow, attested to the fact that many other parents and teachers confirmed these system-wide practices, they told him they were afraid to appear on camera. 

Eva Moskowitz subsequently retaliated against Fatima and her son, by posting a falsified record of his disciplinary infractions, and sharing it with the media.  Fatima filed a FERPA complaint to the federal government, pointing out how this violated his federal privacy rights.  Months later, this falsified list of infractions was taken down from the Success website. 

Shortly after the PBS program ran, the NY Times published  an October 29 article on the “Got to Go list,” composed by the principal at the Fort Greene Success charter school targeting certain students, and explaining that their parents had to be persuaded to take them out of the school.

After that, a petition to the US Department of Education was posted online by Alliance for Quality Education and Color of Change, asking for a federal investigation and that the US Department of Education withhold any more federal funds from the school until the investigation was complete.  The petition pointed out that the US Department of Education had given Success Academy charters more than $37 million dollars since 2010, and nearly three million dollars in 2015 alone.  The petition received over 35,000 signatures.

On December 10, 2015, four parents whose children were on the “Got to Go list” at the Fort Greene Success Academy filed a 27-page lawsuit in federal court, seeking $2 million in damages. On January 4, the NY Times reported that the principal of that school had taken a “personal leave of absence” (though it was later revealed that he is now teaching at another Success charter school in Harlem.)

On January 18, the NY Post wrote that SUNY Charter Institute, the main authorizer of Success charters, was finally launching its own investigation into the practices of these schools.  In a longer story published January 20, Schoolbook revealed that the SUNY Charter Institute had sent a letter five days before to the board chairman of Success Academy, noting “allegations of improper use of student discipline practices to encourage students to dis-enroll, especially at the Fort Greene school.”

On the same date, January 20, a class action complaint to the Office of Civil Rights of the US Department of Education was brought by thirteen parents on behalf of their children with disabilities at eight different Success Academy charter schools in Manhattan, Brooklyn and Bronx.  The complaint highlighted “systemic policies” that violated these students’ federal rights, including harassing and publicly shaming them, refusing to provide them with appropriate services, calling 911 to take them to the hospital when they allegedly misbehaved, and repeatedly suspending them without reporting these actions as suspensions, and without providing them with due process or alternative instruction as required by law.

This class action complaint was joined by City Council Education Danny Dromm and Letitia James, the New York City Public Advocate. You can read the full complaint here.  More recently, another lawsuit was filed by NY Lawyers for Public Interest on behalf of a parent of a former Kindergarten student with disabilities at Fort Greene Success Academy charter school, who was successfully pushed out of the school.  

Yet none of these documented news accounts or lawsuits has had the same impact on the public consciousness as this minute and sixteen second video.  Is it the power of video in the digital age?  The ability to see with your own eyes and viscerally experience the abusive treatment that these young children were forced to suffer through, week after week, year after year?  Whatever the reason, let’s hope that this brings a wider public awareness not only about the practices of this particular chain of charters, but about all the “no excuses” charters that may produce better test scores, but at a very large human cost.

Thursday, March 27, 2014

New video: Why NYC parents are refusing the test! Deny them the data!

See the great new video below made by filmmaker Michael Elliot, explaining why so many NYC parents are having their children refuse the state exams this year.

Today the DOE came out with a new fact sheet about the consequences for those students opting out of the exams, due to start next week.  It makes clear that there will be NO negative consequences for your child:"If, after consulting with the principal, the parents still want to opt their child out of the exams, the principal should respect the parents' decision and let them know that the school will work to the best of their ability to provide the child with an alternate educational activity (eg reading) during these times."

A sample opt out letter to send to your principal is here.   Along with all the other reasons these parents provide for protecting their children from all the stress and pressure, opting out will also deny inBloom and the other vendors the test score data and proficiency levels for your child that the state plans to disclose.   The test scores are the most valuable data to them, for their unreliable teacher evaluation systems, commercial data-mining schemes, and invalid measures of school success.

Have your child refuse the test, if you want to protest and add your voice against the dangerous trend of collecting, tracking and data-mining children without parental consent.

For other information about opting out, check out Change the Stakes and NYS Allies for Public Education.

Sunday, March 16, 2014

Video of our student privacy panel at the NPE conference in Austin last month

Check out the video below Network for Public Education panel presentation on student privacy, held in Austin on February 29, with a short slice of my powerpoint (the rest of it is here), along with some amazing parent advocates who beat back inBloom in their respective states and districts: Jason France of Louisiana (better known as Crazy Crawfish), Rachael Stickland of Colorado, and Julie Woestehoff of Parents United for Responsible Education in Chicago.

We wrap up with Barmak Nassirian of the American Association of State Colleges and Universities, who explains why student privacy is so critical -- and so endangered -- with the weakening of FERPA by the federal government and because so many states, private organizations and vendors are eager to collect, share and data-mine your children's  information.
All of these activists still remain working on this issue, pro bono, including advocating for state legislation to protect privacy,  well aware of how defeating inBloom is only the beginning of a longer battle.
For more information about the 2014 NPE Conference, visit our website and Diane Ravitch's blog, with links to many accounts of the different panels; see also videos of  the terrific keynote speakers, including John Kuhn, Karen Lewis and Diane herself.

Many of the activists I met for the first time said it was the best conference they ever attended, as did and many with whom I was able to re-connect; and I agree.  Please become a member of NPE to support public education, be kept up to date on our activities and be invited to next year's conference.

Thanks to Schoolhouse Live and Vincent Precht for the video.


Saturday, June 1, 2013

video: Diane Ravitch vs. Michelle Rhee

Great video with edited excerpts from a panel discussion at Martha’s Vineyard in 2011, with Diane Ravitch and Michelle Rhee.  Diane is at her best (though she is always terrific.)  For more on this forum and how Rhee has refused to debate her directly,  see Diane's comments here;  here is a video of the whole event.


Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Quinn's speech on education: high and low points


Speaker Christine Quinn, thought to be the frontrunner in the race to replace Mayor Bloomberg, gave a major speech on education yesterday at the New School. The full transcript is here; there’s also a Video, including a brief Q and A by Clara Hemphill of InsideSchools.   

I highly recommend people read the speech and watch the video of the entire event.
Some observations:  The speech was pretty comprehensive and its strengths were that she did express skepticism on many of the worst of Bloomberg policies: rampant school closings and obsessive testing, and she at least implied we don’t need any more charter schools, though she said she wouldn’t make them pay rent when they occupy space in school buildings.  (When she said that would mean the end of charter schools, some in the audience shouted “Good!”)

Yet her speech was disappointingly thin on practical positive proposals to improve our schools, especially in the area of parent input.

  • Though she said she was “proposing a package of reforms called "Parents Matter,”  she  focused on the idea of an  online “Parent University” for parents to learn about nutrition and academic subjects; expanding a “College Readiness Initiative” developed by New Visions that helps inform parents how to ensure their kids are prepared for college by sharing data, and announced a new effort with InsideSchools to “launch an online tool to help simplify the complicated school choice system.”  In all, she seemed to regard parents as Bloomberg does: consumers and passive recipients of information rather than partners in decision-making.  She even compared the need to improve DOE’s “customer service” to Zappos online shoe store.
  • She made a big push on replacing textbooks with tablets, which will be very expensive, if the cost of E-books are included.  (And will allow for-profit companies like Murdoch’s Amplify, run by Joel Klein, to make a lot of money.)
  • She proposed keeping kids in the most high-poverty schools in “structured learning environments” until 6 PM, which many parents (and students) do not support, and which has little research to back it up. 
  • Quinn, like other many of the other candidates, promoted the idea of community schools, including wraparound services such as medical clinics, which is the UFT’s current pet proposal.  Yet this idea, as well as expanding preK which she also supports, will be difficult in most neighborhoods given the overwhelming overcrowding and critical shortage of space in our schools that in many cases has worsened because of enrollment growth and co-locations.   The city council has a legal role in approving the capital plan and yet under Quinn, has never used its authority to require any improvements in its DOE’s faulty enrollment projections, its misplaced priorities, or its underfunding of school construction.
  • On testing, she came out for expanding the portfolio schools and against the current overemphasis on testing and test prep, which she said was an immense waste of time; this part of the speech got the most positive response from the audience.   She even criticized Pearson by name. Yet her one specific proposal, to end the Pearson field tests, is up to the state not the mayor. 
  • Finally, and most grievously, she did not mention class size, the top priority of parents and a critical precondition for improving the quality of NYC schools.  Instead, she called for yet another research study, to be done by Columbia University, to determine what  “best practices” should be replicated.
In the Q and A section, when asked about giving parent-led Community Education Councils more authority, she compared them to Community Boards and maintained that without any change in their current advisory role they could and should be listened to more; but CBs have more influence, in large part, because the City Council gets final vote on land use issues, which it doesn’t on most education policies like school closings or co-locations.  Even so CBs have been overruled on many critical issues like Yankee Stadium and the expansion of Columbia University.
She also expressed confusion and ambivalence when asked about the networks, which most parents detest and many teachers I’ve spoken to think are useless.  Anyway, that's my (admittedly biased) perspective. Here are some news clips; please watch or read the speech and leave your comments below!   

·  In Speech, Quinn Spells Out Education Platform - Metropolis - WSJ

·  Council Speaker Quinn Gives Education Policy Speech - NY1.com

·  Quinn seeks to build on Bloomberg's education legacy - Crains ...

·  Christine Quinn Wants to Model NYC's School System on Zappos  -Politicker...

·  Quinn Outlines New York City Education Policy - Epoch Times

·  Quinn says city schools need collaboration, not competition – Gotham Schools

·  Christine Quinn Wants to Replace Textbooks with Tablets - DNAinfo ...

·Christine Quinn's education speech proposes axing textbooks, extending school until 6 pm;   Metro.us

Friday, October 26, 2012

Must see video of Paul Wellstone on NCLB on 10th anniversary of his death

Paul Wellstone on NCLB, one of only ten Senators who voted against the law.  On the 10th anniversary of this great hero's death.

Among his eloquent points: "test scores don't lead to smaller class size."


Sunday, September 16, 2012

The underlying issues in the Chicago teacher strike according to Julie Cavanagh and Matt Farmer

See video excerpts from "Up with Chris" this morning, MSNBC's show on the Chicago teacher strike.  Here are NYC teacher Julie Cavanagh and Chicago parent Matt Farmer talking about how this is a "defining moment" in the fight against privatization and corporate education reform, and how the Chicago struggle is really about whether poverty and the highly inequitable conditions in our public schools must be addressed. Clips from the rest of the show can be found here.



Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Sunday, November 20, 2011

NYC children and teachers speak out at Occupy Wall St. rally in Foley Sq.

My video taken Sept. 17 of our part of the citywide protests as part of Occupy Wall St. and Occupy the DOE, when, among other things, Justin Wedes taught the Children's Brigade how to use the people's mike, and  teachers and students spoke out in Foley Sq.

Part I and Part II below.  Beautiful and sad.



Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Video: how US economic and political trends have led to plutocracy and larger classes


In two and half minutes, Robert Reich tells the truth re the US economy since 1980.  The size of our economy doubled; but wages stayed flat.  All profits went to the wealthiest; and the top percent now have 40 percent of the wealth.
Which gives them too much political power,  influencing our politicians to lower their their tax rates, leading to deficits and budget cuts and yes, higher class sizes (not to mention more charter schools...)
A must see.